SEC Obtains Summary Judgment Against StratoComm Penny Stock Defendants
On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in Albany, New York granted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s motion for summary judgment on liability against all defendants.
The defendants included StratoComm Corporation; and its CEO Roger D. Shearer, on all charges against them, including violations of the anti-fraud provisions and registration requirements of the federal securities laws.
The SEC alleged that StratoComm, acting at Shearer’s direction issued and distributed public statements falsely portraying the penny stock company as actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of telecommunications systems for use in underdeveloped countries, particularly Africa. In reality, the company had no product and no revenue.
The SEC argued that StratoComm, Shearer sold investors more than $4 million worth of StratoComm stock in unregistered transactions. The SEC also alleged that Shearer used much of that money for his own purposes, including to help pay restitution he owed in connection with his guilty plea in a prior criminal proceeding.
In granting summary judgment in favor of the SEC, the court found that StratoComm violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court also found that Shearer violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, aided and abetted StratoComm’s violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and found him liable as a control person for StratoComm’s violations. Finally, the court found that Danzig violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and aided and abetted StratoComm’s violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
The court has not yet determined the appropriate relief against StratoComm and Shearer.
For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton, Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at [email protected] or visit www.securitieslawyer101.com.
This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. For more information about going public and the rules and regulations affecting the use of Rule 144, Form 8K, crowdfunding, FINRA Rule 6490, Rule 506 private placement offerings and memorandums, Regulation A, Rule 504 offerings, SEC reporting requirements, SEC registration statements on Form S-1 , IPO’s, OTC Pink Sheet listings, Form 10 OTCBB and OTC Markets disclosure requirements, DTC Chills, Global Locks, reverse mergers, public shells, direct public offerings and direct public offerings please contact Hamilton and Associates at (561) 416-8956 or [email protected]. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
