SEC Charges KBR for Inflating Key Performance Metric and Accounting Controls Deficiencies
On July 2, 2018 The Securities and Exchange Commission charged global engineering and construction company KBR Inc. with inflating a key, non-financial statement performance metric known as work in backlog. KBR agreed to pay a $2.5 million penalty to settle the SEC’s charges.
According to the SEC’s order, KBR’s public disclosures of its work in “backlog” were important to investors because the metric was supposed to represent the amount of revenue that KBR expected to receive in the future from “firm orders” under previously awarded contracts. However, the SEC’s order found that in the second quarter of 2012, KBR improperly included $459 million in its publicly disclosed backlog for a pipe fabrication and modular assembly contract in Canada, even though KBR had not actually received — and the counterparty was not obligated to provide — any orders under the contract. By including the full $459 million, KBR misled investors by overstating its work in backlog and violated its internal reporting policies. KBR continued to overstate its backlog for almost two years. The SEC’s order also found that KBR had deficient internal accounting controls and failed to make accurate and reliable estimates of the costs to complete seven Canadian contracts, which led the company to overstate net income. As a result, KBR restated earnings in its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and its unaudited consolidated financial statements for the third quarter of 2013, resulting in charges of $156 million.“Non-financial statement metrics such as backlog can provide additional insight to investors regarding a company’s performance,” said Shamoil T. Shipchandler, Director of the SEC’s SEC. “To the extent that companies disclose these kinds of metrics, companies must ensure they are accurate and not misleading.”
Without admitting or denying the findings, KBR consented to entry of the SEC’s order, which found that the company violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and the books and records, internal accounting controls, and reporting provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and ordered KBR to pay a $2.5 million civil penalty.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Keefe Bernstein, Julia Huseman, and Carol Stumbaugh of the Fort Worth Regional Office. The case was supervised by Barbara Gunn and Eric Werner. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Alberta Securities Commission.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-127
For more information about going public, securities law or our other services please contact a Securities Attorney at Hamilton & Associates Law Group, P.A. 01 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton, Florida, (561) 416-8956 or by email at [email protected]. This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Hamilton & Associates Law Group, P.A provides ongoing corporate and securities counsel to private companies and public companies listed and publicly traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, London Stock Exchange, NASDAQ Stock Market, the NYSE MKT and OTC Markets. For two decades the Firm has served private and public companies and other market participants in corporate law matters, securities law and going public matters. The firm’s practice areas include, but are not limited to, forensic law and investigations, SEC investigations and SEC defense, corporate law matters, compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 securities offer and sale and registration statement requirements, including Regulation A/ Regulation A+ , private placement offerings under Regulation D including Rule 504 and Rule 506 and Regulation S and PIPE Transactions as well as registration statements on Forms S-1, Form F-1, Form S-8 and Form S-4; compliance with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including Form 8-A and Form 10 registration statements, reporting on Forms 10-Q, Form 10-K and Form 8-K, Form 6-K and SEC Schedule 14CInformation and SEC Schedule 14A Proxy Statements; Regulation A / Regulation A+ offerings; all forms of going public transactions; mergers and acquisitions; applications to and compliance with the corporate governance requirements of national securities exchanges including NASDAQ and NYSE MKT and foreign listings; crowdfunding; corporate; and general contract and business transactions. The firm provides preparation of corporate documents and other transaction documents such as share purchase and exchange agreements, stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements and reorganization agreements. The firm prepares the necessary documentation and assists in completing the requirements of federal and state securities laws such as FINRA and DTC for Rule 15c2-11 / Form 211 trading applications, corporate name changes, reverse and forward splits, changes of domicile and other transactions. The firm represents clients in London, Dubai, India, Germany, India, France, Israel, Canada and throughout the U.S.
Category: Blog Posts Tags: Accounting Controls Deficiencies, County, dodd-frank, FBI sting, FBI Undercover, FINRA Halt, fraud, Inflating key performannce, insider trading, Investor Loss, Investor Victims, KBR, nasdaq, nyse, Officer Director Bar, OTC Markets, Penny Stock, Penny Stock Bar, penny stock scam, penny stock scheme, penny stock sting, ponzi scheme, pump and dump, Sarbanes-Oxley, Scalping, scam, SEC, SEC Action, SEC Actions, SEC Administrative Proceeding, SEC anti-fraud, SEC Attorney, sec bar, SEC Bounty, SEC Charge, SEC Charges, SEC Claim, SEC Complaint, SEC Defendant, SEC Defense, SEC Defense Attorney, SEC Defense Lawyer, SEC Division of Enforcement, SEC enforcement, SEC Fraud, SEC Halt, SEC Injunction, SEC Investigation, SEC Law Firm, SEC Lawsuit, SEC Lawyer, SEC Litigation, SEC Penny Stock Bar, SEC Reporting Requirements, SEC Section 17(b), SEC Subpoena, SEC Suit, SEC Trading Suspension, Section 17(b), Section 5 violation, Securities Act, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Attorney, Securities Fraud, Securities Indictment, Securities Law Defense, Securities Lawyer, SPAC, stock manipulation, stock scheme, trading suspension, Unregistered Dealer, Wells Notice