SEC Uses Data Analysis to Detect Cherry-Picking By Broker Michael A. Bressman Alternative Reporting, Alternative Reporting Requirements, Direct Public Offering, Direct Public Offering Attorney, Direct Public Offering Attorneys, Direct Public Offering Lawyer, Exchange Act, Form 1-A, Form 1-K, Form 1-SA, Form 1-Z, Form 211, Form S-1, Form S-1 Attorney, Form S-1 Lawyer, Form SEC, Go Public Direct, Going Public Attorney, Going Public Attorneys, Going Public Lawyer, Going Public Lawyers, Market Maker, OTC Markets, OTC Markets Alternative Reporting, OTC Markets and Sponsoring Market Maker, OTC Markets Attorney, OTC Markets Group, OTC Markets Lawyer, OTC Markets Link, OTC Markets Market Maker, OTC Markets OTC Pink, OTC Markets OTCAX, OTC Markets OTCQB, OTC Markets OTCQX, OTC Markets Sponsoring Market Maker, OTC Pink, OTC Pink Market, OTCQB, OTCQB lawyer, OTCQX, Registered Direct Public Offering, Registration Statement, Regulation A, Regulation A Qualification, Regulation A Reporting, Rule 15c2-11, SEC Effectiveness, SEC Qualification, SEC Reporting, SEC Reporting Obligations, SEC Reporting Requirements, Securities Act

SEC Uses Data Analysis to Detect Cherry-Picking By Broker Michael A. BressmanThe Securities and Exchange Commission charged a New Jersey-based broker with misusing his access to customers’ brokerage accounts to enrich himself and family members at the expense of his customers, many of whom had entrusted him with their retirement accounts. The SEC uncovered the alleged fraud with data analysis used to detect suspicious trading patterns.

The SEC filed fraud charges in federal district court against Michael A. Bressman of Montville, New Jersey, alleging that he misused his access to an omnibus or “allocation” account to obtain at least $700,000 in illicit trading profits over a six-year period ending in February. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Bressman placed trades using the allocation account and cherry-picked profitable trades, which he then transferred to his own account and the account of two family members, while placing unprofitable trades in other customers’ accounts.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts today announced criminal charges against Bressman.

“SEC data analysis played an important role in identifying the alleged securities law violations,” said Joseph G. Sansone, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit.  “We will continue to develop and use data analytics to root out cherry-picking and other frauds.”

The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, charges Bressman with violating antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and a related SEC antifraud rule. The SEC is seeking return of allegedly ill-gotten gains, plus interest, penalties and a permanent injunction.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Vanessa De Simone and Charles Riely of the Market Abuse Unit in the New York Regional Office with assistance from Jonathan Hershaff and Mark Kaplan in the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis and Hugh Beck in the Market Abuse Unit.  The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts and the Boston field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-189

This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates Law Group, P.A provides ongoing corporate and securities counsel to private companies and public companies listed and publicly traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, London Stock Exchange, NASDAQ Stock Market, the NYSE MKT and OTC Markets. For two decades the Firm has served private and public companies and other market participants in corporate law matters, securities law and going public matters. The firm’s practice areas include, but are not limited to, forensic law and investigations, SEC investigations and SEC defense, corporate law matters, compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 securities offer and sale and registration statement requirements, including Regulation A/ Regulation A+ , private placement offerings under Regulation D including Rule 504 and Rule 506 and Regulation S and PIPE Transactions as well as registration statements on Forms S-1, Form F-1, Form S-8 and Form S-4; compliance with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including Form 8-A and Form 10 registration statements, reporting on Forms 10-Q, Form 10-K and Form 8-K, Form 6-K and SEC Schedule 14CInformation and SEC Schedule 14A Proxy Statements; Regulation A / Regulation A+ offerings; all forms of going public transactions; mergers and acquisitions; applications to and compliance with the corporate governance requirements of national securities exchanges including NASDAQ and NYSE MKT and foreign listings; crowdfunding; corporate; and general contract and business transactions. The firm provides preparation of corporate documents and other transaction documents such as share purchase and exchange agreements, stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements and reorganization agreements. The firm prepares the necessary documentation and assists in completing the requirements of federal and state securities laws such as FINRA and DTC for Rule 15c2-11 / Form 211 trading applications, corporate name changes, reverse and forward splits, changes of domicile and other transactions. The firm represents clients in London, Dubai, India, Germany, India, France, Israel, Canada and throughout the U.S.