SEC Adopts New Rules 15Fi-3, 15Fi-4, and 15Fi-5
On Wednesday, December 18, 2019, the SEC adopted new rules 15Fi-3, 15Fi-4, and 15Fi-5, which they describe as risk mitigation techniques for uncleared security-based swaps.
These rules “establish requirements for registered security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants (“SBS Entities”) to:
- Periodically reconcile outstanding security-based swaps with counterparties,
- Engage in certain forms of portfolio compression exercises, as appropriate, and
- Execute written trading relationship documentation with each of their counterparties prior to, or contemporaneously with, executing a security-based swap transaction.”
SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said “These rules are designed to guide and drive security-based swap entities to accurately and effectively manage their market and credit risks throughout the life of a security-based swap transaction, including by mitigating the risk that a disagreement, ambiguity or omission will affect performance.”
You can read a Fact Sheet regarding these new rules below:
FACT SHEET
Risk Mitigation Techniques for Uncleared Security-Based Swaps
December 18, 2019
Action
The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to adopt new Rules 15Fi-3 through 15Fi-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), which require the application of specific risk mitigation techniques to portfolios of uncleared security-based swaps. Specifically, those new rules establish requirements for each registered security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant (collectively, an “SBS Entity”) with respect to, among other things, (1) reconciling outstanding security-based swaps with applicable counterparties on a periodic basis, (2) engaging in certain forms of portfolio compression exercises, as appropriate, and (3) executing written security-based swap trading relationship documentation with each of its counterparties prior to, or contemporaneously with, executing a security-based swap transaction.
Highlights
Rule 15Fi-3: Portfolio Reconciliation
- For purposes of the new requirements, the term “portfolio reconciliation” will be defined to mean the process by which the two parties to one or more security-based swaps:
- Exchange the terms of all security-based swaps in the security-based swap portfolio between the counterparties;
- Exchange each counterparty’s valuation of all outstanding security-based swaps entered into between the counterparties as of the close of business on the immediately preceding business day; and
- Resolve any discrepancy in valuations or material terms.
- For purposes of the above definition, the term “material terms” includes each term of a security-based swap that is required to be reported to a registered swap data repository (“SDR”) or the Commission pursuant to Regulation SBSR, other than a term that is not relevant to the ongoing rights and obligations of the parties and the valuation of the security-based swap.
- Rule 15Fi-3(a) will apply to security-based swap portfolios between two SBS Entities as follows:
- SBS Entity counterparties will be required to engage in portfolio reconciliation no less frequently than:
- Each business day for each portfolio that includes 500 or more security-based swaps;
- Weekly for each portfolio that includes more than 50 but fewer than 500 security-based swaps on the business day during any week; and
- Quarterly for each portfolio that includes no more than 50 security-based swaps at any time during the calendar quarter.
- Any discrepancy in a material term (other than with respect to valuation) must be resolved immediately.
- Valuation discrepancies of ten percent or greater of the higher valuation must be resolved as soon as possible, but in any event within five business days of identifying the discrepancy.
- SBS Entity counterparties will be required to engage in portfolio reconciliation no less frequently than:
- Rule 15Fi-3(b) will apply to security-based swap portfolios between an SBS Entity and a counterparty who is not an SBS Entity as follows:
- The SBS Entity will be required to establish, maintain, and follow written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that it engages in portfolio reconciliation no less frequently than:
- Quarterly for each portfolio that includes more than 100 security-based swaps at any time during the calendar quarter; and
- Annually for each portfolio that includes no more than 100 security-based swaps at any time during the calendar year.
- The policies and procedures also must provide that any discrepancy in the valuation or in a material term must be resolved in a “timely fashion.”
- The SBS Entity will be required to establish, maintain, and follow written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that it engages in portfolio reconciliation no less frequently than:
- Rule 15Fi-3(c) establishes a reporting obligation in the event of certain unresolved security-based swap valuation disputes.
- Specifically, an SBS Entity will be required to promptly notify the Commission of any security-based swap valuation dispute in excess of $20,000,000, at either the transaction or portfolio level, if not resolved within:
- Three (3) business days, if the dispute is with a counterparty that is an SBS Entity; or
- Five (5) business days, if the dispute is with a counterparty that is not an SBS Entity.
- Specifically, an SBS Entity will be required to promptly notify the Commission of any security-based swap valuation dispute in excess of $20,000,000, at either the transaction or portfolio level, if not resolved within:
Rule 15Fi-4: Portfolio Compression
- Rule 15Fi-4(a) will apply to security-based swap portfolios between two SBS Entities, and requires each SBS Entity to establish, maintain, and follow written policies and procedures for:
- Evaluating bilateral and multilateral portfolio compression exercises that are initiated, offered, or sponsored by any third party;
- Periodically engaging in both bilateral portfolio compression exercises and multilateral portfolio compression exercises, in each case when appropriate, with its SBS Entity counterparties; and
- Terminating each fully offsetting security-based swap with its SBS Entity counterparties in a timely fashion, when appropriate.
- Rule 15Fi-4(b) will apply to security-based swap portfolios between an SBS Entity and a counterparty who is not an SBS Entity, and require the SBS Entity to establish, maintain, and follow written policies and procedures for periodically terminating fully offsetting security-based swaps and for engaging in bilateral or multilateral portfolio compression exercises with the applicable counterparty, when appropriate and to the extent requested by any such counterparty.
Rule 15Fi-5: Trading Relationship Documentation
- Rule 15Fi-5(a)(2) will require each SBS Entity to establish, maintain, and follow written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that it executes written security-based swap trading relationship documentation with each of its counterparties (regardless of whether the counterparty is an SBS Entity) prior to, or contemporaneously with, executing a security-based swap with such counterparty.
- Pursuant to Rules 15Fi-5(b)(1) and (3), the applicable policies and procedures will need to:
- Require that the security-based swap trading relationship documentation be in writing, and that it include all terms governing the trading relationship between the SBS Entity and its counterparty, including, without limitation, terms addressing payment obligations, netting of payments, events of default or other termination events, calculation and netting of obligations upon termination, transfer of rights and obligations, governing law, valuation, and dispute resolution.
- Require that the security-based swap trading relationship documentation include credit support arrangements addressing certain margin-related matters identified in the rule.
- Rule 15Fi-5(b)(4) will require that the applicable policies and procedures provide that the relevant swap trading relationship documentation between certain specified types of financial counterparties include written documentation in which the parties agree on the process, which may include any agreed upon methods, procedures, rules, and inputs, for determining the value of each security-based swap at any time from execution to the termination, maturity, or expiration of such security-based swap.
- Such valuation methodology will be for the purposes of complying with the margin requirements under Section 15F(e) of the Exchange Act (and applicable regulations), and the risk management requirements under Section 15F(j) of the Exchange Act (and applicable regulations).
- The rule also specifies that an SBS Entity will not be required to disclose to the counterparty confidential, proprietary information about any model it may use to value a security-based swap.
- Rules 15Fi-5(b)(5) and (6) will require that the policies and procedures governing the applicable trading relationship documentation require SBS Entities to disclose certain information to their counterparties regarding both their legal status and the status of the security-based swap.
- Rule 15Fi-5(c) will require each SBS Entity to have an independent auditor conduct periodic audits sufficient to identify any material weakness in its documentation policies and procedures required by the rule.
Other Highlights
- The release also includes a final cross-border interpretation to treat new Rules 15Fi-3 through 15Fi-5 as entity-level requirements that apply to an SBS Entity’s entire security-based swap business without exception, including in connection with any security-based swap business it conducts with foreign counterparties.
- Further, the release amends Rule 3a71-6 to address the potential availability of substituted compliance in connection with Rules 15Fi-3 through 15Fi-5.
- Finally, the release includes amendments to the recordkeeping, reporting, and notification requirements applicable to SBS Entities to require SBS Entities to make and keep records regarding portfolio reconciliation, bilateral offsets, bilateral or multilateral portfolio compression, valuation disputes, and written trading relationship documentation.
This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute legal advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com