SEC Updates List of Firms Using Inaccurate Information to Solicit Investors

 

SEC Risk Management Disclosure

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on Aug. 6, 2018 that it has updated its list of unregistered firms that use misleading information to primarily solicit non-U.S. investors, adding 16 soliciting entities, four impersonators of genuine firms, and nine bogus regulators.

The updates by the SEC Division of Enforcement’s Office of Market Intelligence, in coordination with the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy and the Office of International Affairs, are part of the agency’s continuing effort to protect retail investors.

The SEC’s list of soliciting entities that have been the subject of investor complaints, known as the Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE) list, enables investors to better inform themselves and avoid being a victim of fraud. The latest additions are firms that the SEC staff found were providing inaccurate information about their affiliation, location, or registration. Under U.S. securities laws, firms that solicit investors generally are required to register with the SEC and meet minimum financial standards and disclosure, reporting, and record keeping requirements. Read More

Deutsche Bank to Pay Nearly $75 Million for Improper Handling of ADRs

Deutsche Bank to Pay Nearly $75 Million for Improper Handling of ADRs

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on July 20, 2018 that two U.S.-based subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank AG will pay nearly $75 million to settle charges of improper handling of “pre-released” American Depositary Receipts (ADRs).

The case stems from a continuing SEC investigation into abuses involving pre-released ADRs. In proceedings against Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, a depositary bank, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (DBSI), a registered broker-dealer, the SEC found that their misconduct allowed pre-released ADRs to be used for abusive practices, including inappropriate short selling and inappropriate profiting around dividend payouts.

ADRs – U.S. securities that represent foreign shares of a foreign company – require a corresponding number of foreign shares to be held in custody at a depositary bank. The practice of “pre-release” allows ADRs to be issued without the deposit of foreign shares, provided brokers receiving them have an agreement with a depositary bank and the broker or its customer owns the number of foreign shares that corresponds to the number of shares the ADR represents. Information about ADRs is available in an SEC Investor Bulletin.

Read More

SEC Charges Unregistered Brokers Who Sold Woodbridge Securities to Main Street Investors

SEC Charges Unregistered Brokers Who Sold Woodbridge Securities to Main Street Investors

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged five individuals and four companies for unlawfully selling securities of Woodbridge Group of Companies LLC to retail investors.  Woodbridge collapsed into bankruptcy in December 2017 and the SEC previously charged the company, its owner, and others with operating a massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme.

The Florida-based defendants named in the SEC’s complaints, Barry M. Kornfeld, Ferne Kornfeld, Lynette M. Robbins, Andrew G. Costa, Albert D. Klager, and their companies, were among Woodbridge’s top revenue producers, selling more than $243 million of its unregistered securities to more than 1,600 retail investors. The complaints allege that defendants reaped millions of dollars in commissions on their sales of Woodbridge securities even though they were not registered as broker-dealers and were not permitted to sell securities.  Barry Kornfeld also violated a prior SEC order which barred him from acting as a broker.

“The broker-dealer and securities registration provisions are vital protections for retail investors,” said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office.  “Our actions allege the defendants, while not registered as broker-dealers, pocketed millions of dollars in unlawful commissions from their widespread sales of unregistered Woodbridge securities.” Read More

SEC Charges Mizuho Securities for Failure to Safeguard Customer Information

SEC Charges Mark Burnett, Jeffrey Miller, Christian Romandetti, Frank Sarro, Anthony Vassallo, and Elite Stock Research, Inc.in Boiler Room

On July 23, 2018 The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Mizuho Securities USA LLC for its failure to safeguard information pertaining to stock buybacks by its issuer customers.  Mizuho failed to maintain and enforce policies and procedures aimed at preventing the misuse of material nonpublic information, including maintaining effective information barriers between different trading desks and requiring employees to keep client information confidential.  Mizuho agreed to settle the charges and will pay a $1.25 million penalty.

According to the SEC’s order, during a two-year period, Mizuho traders regularly disclosed material nonpublic customer buyback information to other traders and Mizuho’s hedge fund clients.  That information included the identity of the party placing the order, the order size, limit price, and indications that the orders were buyback orders. Such information was routinely communicated across trading desks, notwithstanding that during the relevant period Mizuho executed over 99.8 percent of all buyback orders by using algorithms, rather than through trader-negotiated open market trades.

Read More

Citigroup to Pay More Than $10 Million for Books and Records Violations and Inadequate Controls

Citigroup to Pay More Than $10 Million for Books and Records Violations and Inadequate Controls

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Citigroup has agreed to pay $10.5 million in penalties to settle two enforcement actions involving its books and records, internal accounting controls, and trader supervision. The charges stem from $81 million of losses due to trader mismarking and unauthorized proprietary trading and $475 million of losses due to fraudulently-induced loans made by a Mexican subsidiary.  

In the first action, Citigroup Inc. and its U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI) agreed to pay a $5.75 million penalty to settle charges of inaccurate books and records and CGMI’s failure reasonably to supervise traders. Citigroup and CGMI settled without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings and agreed to cease and desist from future violations.  

The SEC found that from 2013 to 2016, three CGMI traders mismarked illiquid positions in certain proprietary accounts they managed, in two cases covering losses from widespread unauthorized trading. The discovery of the mismarking led to the termination of the traders and the recognition of $81 million in losses not previously reflected in CGMI’s or Citigroup’s books and records. The SEC’s order finds that CGMI failed to detect the traders’ misconduct earlier because it had inadequate supervisory procedures and systems and did not independently verify the valuations of the mismarked positions.  Read More

The Distinction Between Equity Crowdfunding and Rule 506(c) When Raising Capital

Rule 504 Offerings

The JOBS Act’s new rules permitting general solicitation and advertising in Rule 506 private placements became effective on September 23, and there is still some confusion about the difference between equity crowdfunding and general solicitation and advertising in Rule 506(c) offerings also known as accredited crowdfunding. Rule 506 is the most commonly used exemption for raising capital in connection with going public transactions that involve filing a registration statement on Form S-1.

While the public, and perhaps even some companies, may think that accredited  crowdfunding under Rule 506 and equity crowdfunding as the same thing, for the SEC they are not.  Crowdfunding is generally defined as raising small amounts of money from many people, rather than large amounts from a few.  In recent years, it’s often been used to provide funding for disaster relief, political campaigns, and other “causes” of interest to many people.  It is a concept and a technique.  The SEC doesn’t regulate concepts,  but it does have jurisdiction over companies that choose to apply those concepts, and to those who participate in their application. Read More

What is a Private Placement Memorandum – PPM? Going Public Lawyers

Securities Lawyer 101 - What Are Private Placement Memorandums
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

A private placement memorandum sometimes called a PPM is used by private companies  in going public transactions and by existing public companies to raise capital by selling either debt or equity in an exempt offering.  These exempt offerings are usually  private placements. PPM disclosures vary depending on a couple of factors including whether the investor is accredited or non-accredited and whether the Company is subject to the SEC’s reporting requirements, and a few other factors. When a Company sells equity, it most often offers common shares to investors who then become shareholders of the Company. Read More

SEC Adopts Amendments to Simplify and Update Disclosure Requirements

KPMG - Audit Failure

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has voted to adopt amendments to certain disclosure requirements that have become duplicative, overlapping, or outdated in light of other Commission disclosure requirements, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), or changes in the information environment.  

The amendments are intended to simplify and update the disclosure of information to investors, including long-term Main Street investors, and reduce compliance burdens for companies without significantly altering the total mix of information available to investors.

“It is important to review our regulations to ensure that they evolve along with our capital markets and remain effective and efficient,” said SEC Chairman Jay Clayton. “Today’s amendments are an example of how thoughtful reviews can prompt changes for the benefit of investors, public companies, and our capital markets.” Read More

SEC Charges Ameriprise Financial Services for Failing to Safeguard Client Assets

SEC Charges Ameriprise Financial Services for Failing to Safeguard Client Assets

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. will pay $4.5 million to settle charges that it failed to safeguard retail investor assets from theft by its representatives. 

According to the SEC’s order, five Ameriprise representatives committed numerous fraudulent acts, including forging client documents, and stole more than $1 million in retail client funds over a four-year period. The SEC found that Ameriprise, a registered investment adviser and broker-dealer, failed to adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to safeguard investor assets against misappropriation by its representatives. 

The five representatives were based in Minnesota, Ohio, and Virginia, and three previously pled guilty to criminal charges. Each of the representatives was terminated by Ameriprise for misappropriating client funds. The SEC’s order found that Ameriprise has implemented a new system to safeguard clients’ money and that Ameriprise reimbursed all impacted clients for the losses they incurred due to the misconduct of the five representatives. Read More

Rule 506 Roadmap l Ask Securities Lawyer 101

Rule 506 Attorneys

Private placement offerings under Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) are a cost effective and relatively quick way for private companies to raise capital prior to their going public transactions.  According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Rule 506 is the relied upon by issuers more than any other exemption from registration.  Rule 506(c) fundamentally changes the way unregistered offerings may be conducted. While the rule imposes stringent requirements, these requirements are manageable for issuers putting effective  compliance strategies into place. Read More

SEC Adopts Rule Amendments to Improve Municipal Securities Disclosure

SEC Adopts Rule Amendments to Improve Municipal Securities Disclosure

The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to enhance transparency in the municipal securities market. The adopted amendments to Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities Exchange Act will focus on material financial obligations that could impact an issuer’s liquidity, overall creditworthiness, or an existing security holder’s rights.

“Our municipal securities market is a $3.844 trillion dollar market, with new issuances of approximately $448.1 billion in 2017. Our Main Street investors are exposed to this market through many channels, including through mutual funds, money market funds, closed-end funds, and exchange-traded funds,” said Chairman Jay Clayton. “Disclosures required by these rule amendments will better equip investors and intermediaries to make informed investment decisions about municipal securities.”

Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities Exchange Act requires brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers that are acting as underwriters in primary offerings of municipal securities to reasonably determine that the issuer or obligated person has agreed to provide to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) timely notice of certain events. Today’s amendments add two new events to the list included in the rule: Read More

Merrill Lynch Settles SEC Charges of Undisclosed Conflict in Advisory Decision

Merrill Lynch Settles SEC Charges of Undisclosed Conflict in Advisory Decision

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith has agreed to pay approximately $8.9 million to settle charges that it failed to disclose a conflict of interest arising out of its own business interests in deciding whether to continue to offer clients products managed by an outside third-party advisory firm.  

The SEC’s order finds that the conflict of interest arose in Merrill Lynch’s handling of third-party products managed by a U.S. subsidiary of a foreign multinational bank, in which more than 1,500 of Merrill’s retail advisory accounts had invested approximately $575 million. According to the order, Merrill put new investments into these products on hold due to pending management changes at the third party, and Merrill’s governance committee planned to vote on a recommendation to terminate the products and offer alternatives to investors. According to the order, the third-party manager sought to prevent termination and contacted senior Merrill executives, including making an appeal to consider the companies’ broader business relationship. Following those communications, and in a break from ordinary practices, the governance committee did not vote and chose to defer action on termination. The governance committee later lifted the hold and opened the third-party products to new Merrill accounts. The SEC’s order found that Merrill failed to disclose to its clients the conflicts of interest in Merrill’s decision-making process.  Read More

SEC Charges Technology Fund Adviser Michael B. Rothenberg, Founder in Fraudulent Scheme

SEC Charges Technology Fund Adviser, Founder in Fraudulent Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged the founder of San Francisco-based venture capital funds and his investment advisory firm with overcharging investors to fund personal projects, including sending millions of dollars to his own virtual reality production company.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Michael B. Rothenberg, 34, marketed his advisory firm, Rothenberg Ventures LLC, as uniquely positioned to identify millennial entrepreneurs and invest in “frontier technology” companies. According to SEC filings, Rothenberg’s funds had nearly 200 investors and more than $64 million in assets. The SEC’s complaint alleges that over a three-year period, Rothenberg and his firm misappropriated millions of dollars from the funds, including an estimated $7 million of excess fees, which Rothenberg used to support personal business ventures he claimed were self-funded and to pay for private parties and events at high-end resorts and Bay Area sporting arenas. Read More

How to Spot a Penny Stock Scam

How to Spot a Penny Stock ScamHave you ever played a penny stock?  Or invested in one you believed or hoped was real, perhaps even the Next Big Thing?  If so, you probably know the roads in Pennyland are full of potholes.  Many of the locals are promoters, and they’re aided, wittingly or not, by amateur pumpers who spread the word about hot new “picks” across the social media.  Both stress the potential for short term gains far greater than those achievable on the national exchanges.  They aren’t entirely wrong.  Penny stocks can be extremely volatile; they can run hundreds of percentage points for little reason, or for no reason at all.  

No stock quadruples or quintuples in price over a few days and continues to rise.  What goes up really does come down, usually as quickly as it went up.  When touts say a stock is about to “go parabolic,” that’s often literally the case.  It may well return to the range it traded in before it was pumped.  That process, repeated countless times every year in the OTC market, is called a “pump and dump.”  Pumps and dumps are considered by the SEC to be illegal securities manipulation.  Unfortunately, only the most blatant are investigated by the agency, and their ringleaders eventually sanctioned.  Taken by surprise, the inexperienced and unwary find themselves trapped, stuck with stock they’ll only be able to sell if another pump and dump is launched at some future date.  Even seasoned traders can miscalculate.  If they jump on board too late, and the play peaks too early, they may end up with unexpected losses. Read More

SEC Chairman Clayton Announces Additional Investor Roundtable in Baltimore for Main Street Investors to ‘Tell Us’ About Their Investor Experience

SEC Chairman Clayton Announces Additional Investor Roundtable in Baltimore for Main Street Investors to ‘Tell Us’ About Their Investor ExperienceSecurities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton announced that an additional investor roundtable to discuss the Commission’s recently proposed rules regarding the obligations of financial professionals to investors will be held in Baltimore on the evening of Sept. 20, 2018.  Commissioners Kara Stein and Robert Jackson are expected to join Chairman Clayton and senior SEC staff at this event.

Six roundtable discussions already have taken place in Houston, Atlanta, Miami, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, and Denver.  In these roundtables, Main Street investors have had the opportunity to speak directly with Chairman Clayton and senior staff about the SEC’s efforts to enhance retail investor protection and promote choice and access to a variety of investment services and products.  

“These investor roundtables have been incredibly valuable, and I have enjoyed engaging directly with our Main Street investors.  It is important to me that we hear retail investors’ perspectives on how our proposed rules can better align standards of conduct with what they expect of their investment professionals,” said Chairman Clayton.  “We have had many insightful discussions and received some great ideas.  I look forward to speaking with more investors in Baltimore about their experiences.” Read More

SEC Charges Endurance International Group Holdings Inc. Executives With Inflating Operating Metrics

SEC Charges Former Online Marketing Company Executives With Inflating Operating Metrics

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced settled charges with two former top officers of Endurance International Group Holdings Inc. for overstating the company’s subscriber base, and charged a former executive of Constant Contact Inc. for making similar misrepresentations. 

The SEC’s orders find that Endurance’s former chief executive Hari Ravichandran and former chief financial officer Waruna Ellawala knowingly provided inflated subscriber figures for the Massachusetts-based online marketing company.  The SEC also filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts alleging that former Constant Contact CFO Harpreet Grewal hid its slowing customer growth from investors and inflated its publicly reported subscriber numbers.  Constant Contact became a subsidiary of Endurance after it was acquired by it in 2016.

The SEC filed a settled enforcement action in June against Endurance and Constant Contact in which Endurance agreed to pay an $8 million penalty.  In the latest action, Ravichandran and Ellawala agreed to settle the charges without admitting or denying them and pay $1.38 million and $34,000 respectively in disgorgement, interest, and penalties.  They also agreed to cease and desist from further violations of various antifraud, reporting, books and records, and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws.  Read More

Barry Miller, Associate Director in Division of Investment Management, to Leave SEC After More Than 40 Years of Public Service

Barry Miller, Associate Director in Division of Investment Management, to Leave SEC After More Than 40 Years of Public Service

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Barry D. Miller, Associate Director of Disclosure Review and Accounting in the Division of Investment Management, will retire from the SEC at the end of this month after more than 40 years of public service, including more than 30 years of service at the SEC.

As an associate director overseeing the division’s disclosure and accounting review programs, Mr. Miller has been primarily responsible for the implementation of disclosure and accounting policy that impacts nearly 16,000 investment companies, including open-end, closed-end, exchange-traded funds, unit investment trusts, and business development companies. His work included overseeing the review of many novel funds involving new and unique structures and strategies, including some of the first exchange-traded funds. Mr. Miller also provided key counsel on all rules that impact or include disclosure and accounting requirements, from managing the overhaul of mutual fund disclosures following the 2009 “summary prospectus” reforms to building a new review system for fund annual reports as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Mr. Miller also has overseen the modernization of how the Division reviews fund disclosures, including incorporating the use of data to target key issues and increase the efficiency of the review process. Read More

SEC Files Charges Gannon Giguiere in Busted Microcap Schemes

SEC Files Charges in Busted Microcap Schemes

On July 13, 2018 The Securities and Exchange Commission charged a stock promoter and four others involved in an alleged series of microcap fraud schemes that were foiled by FBI undercover work and an SEC trading suspension.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in southern California on July 6, stock promoter Gannon Giguiere took control of a purported medical device company. Giguiere, together with a Cayman Islands-based broker, then allegedly engaged in a matched trading scheme that caused the company’s share price to rise from zero to $1.20 per share.

Giguiere and the brokerage owner, Oliver-Barret Lindsay, allegedly coordinated their matched trading through an individual who turned out to be an FBI cooperating witness. According to the complaint, despite extensive encrypted communications, the defendants were caught by an undercover FBI operation that recorded their communications, with Lindsay going so far as to tell an individual cooperating with the FBI, “I’m a little hesitant about typing all of these details into this app. … You can just imagine if it finds its way somewhere it’s fairly incriminating.” According to the complaint, the pair’s plan to dump millions of shares in the purported medical device company was thwarted when, this past March, the SEC suspended trading in the securities of the purported medical device company.

Read More

Former CEO Kevin Modany and CFO Daniel Fitzpatrick of ITT Barred and Ordered to Pay Penalties

Former CEO and CFO of ITT Barred and Ordered to Pay Penalties

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on July 6, 2018  settlements with two former senior executives of ITT Educational Services Inc., which the SEC charged hid its true financial condition from investors.  This resolution successfully concludes the SEC’s case, which was scheduled to begin trial on July 9.

Former CEO Kevin Modany and former CFO Daniel Fitzpatrick are barred from holding senior positions at public companies and ordered to pay penalties in the settlements filed in federal court in Indiana. “Holding individuals accountable – particularly senior executives – is a critical focus of our enforcement program,” said Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “These settlements, entered into on the eve of trial after years of litigation, reflect our commitment to this accountability.”

Read More

SEC Files Additional Charges in Fitbit Stock Manipulation Scheme Against Mark Burns And Robert Murray

SEC Files Additional Charges in Fitbit Stock Manipulation Scheme Against Mark Burns And Robert Murray

On July 11, 2018 The Securities and Exchange Commission filed fraud charges against a second defendant in connection with a scheme to manipulate the price of Fitbit securities through false regulatory filings.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Mark E. Burns purchased Fitbit call options just minutes before he and his co-conspirator, Robert W. Murray, filed a fake tender offer on the SEC’s EDGAR system purporting to acquire Fitbit’s shares at a substantial premium. The SEC charged Murray last year and he recently was sentenced to prison in a parallel criminal case. The false tender offer was made in the name of ABM Capital LTD – a nonexistent company for which the defendants created an EDGAR account. Fitbit’s stock price temporarily spiked when the tender offer became publicly available on Nov. 10, 2016, and Burns sold all of his options for a 350 percent profit of approximately $13,000.

“We allege that Burns and Murray tried to camouflage their identities and their affiliation with an EDGAR account by using disguised IP and e-mail addresses,” said Robert A. Cohen, Chief of the Cyber Unit. “Despite their sophisticated efforts to avoid detection, we stopped their alleged abuse of our filing system and charged them with being responsible for this manipulation.”

Read More

SEC Charges Credit Suisse With FCPA Violations

SEC Charges Credit Suisse With FCPA Violations

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on July 5, 2018 that Credit Suisse Group AG will pay approximately $30 million to resolve SEC charges that it obtained investment banking business in the Asia-Pacific region by corruptly influencing foreign officials in violation of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Credit Suisse also agreed to pay a $47 million criminal penalty to the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to the SEC’s order, several senior Credit Suisse managers in the Asia-Pacific region sought to win business by hiring and promoting individuals connected to government officials as part of a quid pro quo arrangement.  While the practice of hiring client referrals bypassed the firm’s normal hiring process, employees in other Credit Suisse subsidiaries and affiliates were aware of it and in some instances approved these “relationship hires” or “referral hires.”  The SEC’s order found that in a six-year period, Credit Suisse offered to hire more than 100 individuals referred by or connected to foreign government officials, resulting in millions of dollars of business revenue.

Read More

SEC Charges KBR for Inflating Key Performance Metric and Accounting Controls Deficiencies

On July 2, 2018 The Securities and Exchange Commission charged global engineering and construction company KBR Inc. with inflating a key, non-financial statement performance metric known as work in backlog.  KBR agreed to pay a $2.5 million penalty to settle the SEC’s charges.

According to the SEC’s order, KBR’s public disclosures of its work in “backlog” were important to investors because the metric was supposed to represent the amount of revenue that KBR expected to receive in the future from “firm orders” under previously awarded contracts.  However, the SEC’s order found that in the second quarter of 2012, KBR improperly included $459 million in its publicly disclosed backlog for a pipe fabrication and modular assembly contract in Canada, even though KBR had not actually received — and the counterparty was not obligated to provide — any orders under the contract.  By including the full $459 million, KBR misled investors by overstating its work in backlog and violated its internal reporting policies.  KBR continued to overstate its backlog for almost two years.  The SEC’s order also found that KBR had deficient internal accounting controls and failed to make accurate and reliable estimates of the costs to complete seven Canadian contracts, which led the company to overstate net income.  As a result, KBR restated earnings in its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and its unaudited consolidated financial statements for the third quarter of 2013, resulting in charges of $156 million. Read More

SEC Charges BGC Financial For Failure to Preserve Documents and Maintain Accurate Books and Records

SEC Charges BGC Financial for Failure to Preserve Documents and Maintain Accurate Books and Records

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on July 17, 2018 that New York-based broker-dealer BGC Financial has agreed to pay a $1.25 million penalty to settle charges that it failed to preserve audio files sought by the SEC and inaccurately recorded travel, entertainment, and other expenses.

The SEC’s order finds that after receiving document requests in 2014 from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, BGC deleted audio files for the recorded telephone lines of eight brokers that were responsive to the document requests.  According to the order, the department responsible for maintaining voice recordings was unaware of the SEC’s request and deleted the files in keeping with the firm’s policy of not maintaining them after one year.

The SEC order also finds that BGC failed to maintain books and records that accurately recorded compensation, travel, entertainment, and gifts.  BGC provided a high performing broker with season tickets for a New York-area sports team that cost more than $600,000 per year, and failed to record the payments for the tickets as compensation in its general ledger. BGC also reimbursed this same broker for more than $100,000 of expenses associated with an international trip for his birthday and other foreign travel that lacked a sufficiently documented business purpose.  BGC inaccurately recorded these items in its books and records as selling and promotion.  BGC also reimbursed a different broker for thousands of dollars of personal expenses spent on his birthday party, his bachelor party, and two separate trips to Las Vegas for his friends’ bachelor parties.

Read More

SEC Files Charges Core Performance Management LLC, RMR Asset Management Co in Municipal Bond “Flipping” and Kickback Schemes

SEC Files Charges in Municipal Bond “Flipping” and Kickback SchemesThe Securities and Exchange Commission charged two firms and 18 individuals in a scheme to improperly divert new issue municipal bonds to broker-dealers at the expense of retail investors.  According to the SEC’s complaint, the defendants – known in the industry as “flippers” – purchased new issue municipal bonds, often by posing as retail investors to gain priority in bond allocations. The defendants then “flipped” the bonds to broker-dealers for a fee. The SEC also charged a municipal underwriter for accepting kickbacks from one of the flippers.

The SEC alleges that from at least 2009 to 2016, Core Performance Management LLC, RMR Asset Management Co., their principals, and certain of their associates, misrepresented their identities to gain priority in new issue municipal bond allocations. Municipal issuers typically require underwriters to give retail investor orders the highest priority when allocating new issue bonds, particularly retail investors within the municipal issuer’s jurisdiction. According to the SEC’s complaint, these defendants used fictitious business names, falsely linked their orders to ZIP codes within the issuer’s jurisdiction, and split orders among dozens of accounts. After acquiring the bonds, the SEC alleges that the defendants quickly resold them to broker-dealers, typically for a fixed, pre-arranged commission, and often sought to hide the flipping activity from issuers and underwriters by manipulating sales tickets.

Read More

SEC Charges Cloud Communications Company and Senior Executives Mark Greenquist And Michael Swade With Misleading Revenue Projections

SEC Charges Cloud Communications Company and Senior Executives Mark Greenquist And Michael Swade With Misleading Revenue Projections

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged a cloud communications company and two executives with providing misleading quarterly revenue estimates. The company and executives agreed to pay over $1.9 million in penalties to settle the SEC’s charges.

According to the SEC’s order, Sonus Networks Inc.’s former CFO, Mark Greenquist, was aware of red flags which undermined the company’s first quarter 2015 revenue estimates.  These red flags included that Sonus had pulled forward deals initially projected to close in 2015 in order to achieve its revenue guidance for the fourth quarter of 2014.  Despite recognizing these risks, Greenquist said in a press release that he was comfortable with the consensus analyst revenue estimate of $74 million for the first quarter.  About six weeks later, the company issued guidance of $74 million which reflected certain forecasted sales that had been improperly reclassified, due to pressure from Michael Swade, Sonus’s Vice President of Global Sales, in order to support the $74 million estimate. Read More

Foreign Private Issuers NYSE Audit Committee Requirements

Foreign Private Issuers NYSE Audit Committee Requirements

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance standards are contained in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The NYSE corporate governance standards apply to all US companies that are listing or have listed equity securities on the NYSE (see NYSE Listed Company Manual). Foreign Private Issuers must comply with the audit committee standards in Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

Compliance with SEC Rules

Foreign Private Issuers must have an audit committee that complies with the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Additionally, a Foreign private issuer must disclose how its corporate governance standards in its home country differ from the NYSE corporate governance requirements. Foreign private issuers that are subject to SEC Reporting Requirements and required to file a Form 20-F must disclose this corporate governance information in their Form 20-F report. All other foreign private issuers can provide this information on their websites or in annual reports filed with the SEC. Read More

Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506(b) Exempt Offerings – Securities Lawyer 101

Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506(b) Exempt Offerings

Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) exempts Rule 506(b) securities offerings from the SEC’s registration requirements when the transactions are by an issuer and do not involve a public offering of securities. Rule 506(b) is used by both private and public companies seeking to raise capital without the use of general solicitation and advertising.

To qualify a securities offering for the Section 4(a)(2) exemption, investors in the offering must:

  • either have enough knowledge and experience in finance and business matters to be “sophisticated investors” who are able to evaluate the risks and merits of the investment, or be able to bear the investment’s economic risk; and
  • have access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus of a SEC registration statement such as Form S-1.

In general, public advertising of the offering, and general solicitation of investors, is incompatible with the Section 4(a)(2) exemption. As the number of investors increases and their relationship to the company and its management becomes more remote, it is more difficult to demonstrate that the offering qualifies for this exemption. If a company offers securities to even one person who does not meet the necessary conditions, the securities offering may be in violation of the Securities Act. Read More

Foreign Private Issuer NYSE Audit Committee Requirements

Foreign Private Issuer NYSE Audit Committee Requirements

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance standards are contained in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The NYSE corporate governance standards apply to all US companies that are listing or have listed equity securities on the NYSE (see NYSE Listed Company Manual). Foreign Private Issuers must comply with the audit committee standards in Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

Compliance with SEC Rules

Foreign Private Issuers must have an audit committee that complies with the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Additionally, a Foreign private issuer must disclose how its corporate governance standards in its home country differ from the NYSE corporate governance requirements. Foreign private issuers that are subject to SEC Reporting Requirements and required to file a Form 20-F must disclose this corporate governance information in their Form 20-F report. All other foreign private issuers can provide this information on their websites or in annual reports filed with the SEC. Read More

SEC Charges U.S. Congressman Christopher Collins and Others With Insider Trading

SEC Charges U.S. Congressman Christopher Collins and Others With Insider Trading

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on Aug. 8, 2018  the filing of insider trading charges against Congressman Christopher Collins, the U.S. Representative for New York’s 27th Congressional District, his son, Cameron Collins, and a third individual, Stephen Zarsky. In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York today announced related criminal charges.

Christopher Collins, who served as an independent director of an Australian biotech company, Innate Immunotherapeutics Ltd., is charged with tipping Cameron Collins after receiving confidential information about negative clinical trial results for Innate’s multiple sclerosis drug. Cameron Collins and his girlfriend’s father, Stephen Zarsky, are charged with trading and tipping others on the basis of the material, nonpublic information. Read More

Regulation A+ Guidebook

Regulation A+ Lawyers – Regulation A+ White Paper

Overview of the Regulation A+ Exemption

On March 25, 2015, The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted final rules to implement Section 401 of The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act by expanding Regulation A into two tiers. These changes have had a notable impact on companies raising capital and going public particularly companies quoted by the OTC Markets.

Tier 1 of Regulation A+ provides an exemption for securities offerings of up to $20 million in a 12-month period while Tier 2 provides an exemption for securities offerings of up to $50 million in a 12-month period. An issuer of $20 million or less of securities in its offering can elect to proceed under either Tier 1 or Tier 2. Read More