The SEC Pursues Shell Packer, Joseph Meuse


Securities Law Blog

On November 25, 2014, the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced administrative proceedings against Joseph Meuse pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).  According to the SEC, from April 2004 through at least September 2009, Meuse was the founder, president and sole owner of Belmont Partners, LLC (“Belmont”), a shell packer whose business was to sell shell companies for reverse merger transactions.  

From May 2008 through January 2014, Joseph Meuse was also the president and majority owner of a transfer agent registered with the SEC.  From January 2005 through January 2011, Meuse was associated with various broker-dealers registered with the Commission.  Meuse served as a director of Alternative Green Technologies, Inc. (“AGTI”) in October 2008.  

In 2011, the SEC filed an action against Meuse.  Meuse released a press release at that time stating, “Contrary to the SEC’s allegations, we were not involved in, nor did we have any knowledge of, the alleged stock selling scheme by the Company and its current management.  We only briefly held an interest in the Company before selling it to Sierra Range Holdings, an entity controlled by Mitchell Segal, a New York attorney with a stellar resume..Given our undisputed lack of involvement in the stock manipulation described in the SEC’s complaint, we are genuinely disturbed by the SEC’s focus on our firm and Mr. Meuse, and view as unfair and inappropriate the quoted disparaging remarks by a high-ranking SEC official contained in the agency’s litigation release, which glosses over the alleged egregious conduct of the other defendants.” Read More

Feds to Auction Silk Road Bitcoins Belonging to Ross William Ulbricht

 BitCoin Auction
Last week, the US Marshals Service announced that it will hold an auction on December 4, to sell 50,000 bitcoins that belong to Ross William Ulbricht.  Ulbricht is alleged to have operated the first Silk Road website that was often used for illegal activity including drug trafficking.  According to the US Marshals Service, Ulbricht had 114,000 bitcoins stored on his computers when they were seized by federal authorities after his arrest last month. Read More

Trends in Bitcoin Regulation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities Law Blog

On October 27, 2014, FinCEN issued two administrative rulings to companies seeking guidance on whether a company would be required to register as an MSD as defined under the BSA and be subject to the required reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring obligations. In its first letter, it responded to whether a company’s plans to set up a virtual currency trading and booking platform, similar to a traditional securities or commodities exchange, would make it subject to FinCEN regulations.  Read More

SEC Censures Eureeca.com For Selling To US Investors

SEC Censures Eureeca.com
Securities Law Blog

On November 12, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) censured Eureeca.com, a Cayman Islands-based crowdfunding website for its failure to implement procedures “reasonably designed” to prevent U.S. investors from using its funding portal as a means to invest in securities offerings. In May 2013, Eureeca, through its website (www.eureeca.com), started a securities-based, crowdfunding platform that connects issuers with investors to raise funds in exchange for equity.  Eureeca’s website offers securities of non-U.S. issuers.

The securities offerings listed on Eureeca’s website were not registered with the SEC. Read More

SEC Suspends Trading in Ebola Tickers

SEC Suspends Trading in Ebola Tickers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) suspended trading in four companies that claim to be developing products or services in response to the Ebola outbreak, citing a lack of publicly available information about the companies’ operations. The SEC simultaneously issued an investor alert warning about the potential for fraud in microcap companies purportedly involved in Ebola prevention, testing, or treatment, noting that scam artists often exploit the latest crisis in the news cycle to lure investors into supposedly promising investment opportunities. Read More

SEC Charges Eric Van Nguyen, Jay Fung and Anthony Thompson

Trading Suspension

On November 17, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) charged three penny stock promoters with conducting pump-and-dump schemes involving stocks they were touting in purported independent newsletters.  The SEC alleges that Anthony Thompson, Jay Fung, and Eric Van Nguyen worked in coordinated fashion to gain control of the public float of penny stock companies. Read More

Joseph Noel Charged In Stock Scalping Scheme


Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On November 17, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) charged Joseph Noel, the Chief Executive Officer of YesDTC Holdings, a San Francisco-based penny stock company.  Noel is charged with defrauding investors by issuing false and misleading press releases in order to pump up the stock price up while he secretly sold his shares into the public market for proceeds of over $300,000.  This practice is known as “stock scalping”. Read More

Why BrokerCheck is Flawed – Going Public Lawyer

BrokerCheck Attorney
Securities Law Blog

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s BrokerCheck is a free tool available to the public that provides some information about the professional backgrounds of brokerage firms and brokers currently or formerly registered with FINRA or a national securities exchange.

It provides similar information for current or former investment adviser firms and representatives. Read More

FINRA Investor Survey Reveals Support for Regulatory Protections

Securities Lawyer 101-Going Public Lawyer

Securities Law Blog

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently released a survey of U.S. investors designed to measure perceptions of fairness and to gauge demand for additional regulatory protections.   FINRA’s Investor Survey was conducted October 7 through October 9, 2014 and October 27 through October 29, 2014. Read More

CFTC Addresses the Use of Rule 506 By Commodity Pool Operators

CFTC

Securities Law Blog

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) recently issued an Exemptive Relief letter No. 14-116 allowing certain operators of commodity pools (Commodity Pool Operators) to rely upon Rule 506 for certain securities offerings.  Exemptive Relief was issued in response to amendments made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), pursuant to the JOBS Act, which adds a new registration exemption to Rule 506 of Regulation D and amend Rule 144A.   Read More

FINRA Addresses Confidentiality Provisions In Notice 14-40

Securities Law Blog

In  FINRA Regulatory Notice 14-40, members are cautioned that it is a violation of FINRA Rule 2010- Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade- to incorporate confidentiality provisions into settlement agreements where the provisions seek to restrict or prohibit a customer or other person from reporting and/or communicating with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), FINRA, or any federal or state regulatory authority regarding possible violations of the securities laws. Read More

NASDAQ Submits Proposals Requiring Public Disclosure of Denied Listing Applications


On October 30, 2014, NASDAQ submitted a proposal addressing initial NASDAQ listing applications.  The proposals include that a company could withdraw its initial listing application at any time.  NASDAQ’s policies have always permitted a company to withdraw its initial listing application at any time, and as such, the proposals would formally make this policy part of NASDAQ’s rules. Read More

Medbox, Inc. Announces SEC Investigation

Securities Lawyer 101 l Brenda Hamilton Attorney
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On November 12, 2014, Medbox, Inc. (MDBX) put an end to nearly two weeks of speculation by acknowledging in its 10-Q for the period ended September 30 that the company has received a formal notice of investigation from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  According to the quarterly report, on November 10, the SEC “notified the Company that it is conducting an investigation pertaining to the Company and issued a subpoena to the Company for documents from December 1, 2011 to the present relating to the matters it is reviewing. Read More

Belizean Judge Removes Asset Freeze in Robert Bandfield Case

Belizean Judge Removes Asset Freeze in Robert Bandfield Case
On November 10, 2014, Belizean Chief Justice Kenneth Benjamin ordered the removal of a freeze on accounts owned by six defendants in what the U.S. government describes as a $500 million fraud case.  The U.S. alleges that three Belize broker-dealers, Legacy Global Markets S.A., Unicorn International Securities LLC, and Titan International Securities, Inc., participated in the fraud. The funds were frozen in early September by Belize’s Financial Intelligence Unit (“FIU”) at the request of the U.S. government. Simultaneously, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York announced criminal charges against Robert Bandfield and Andrew Godfrey, who owned and operated a company called IPC Corporate Services.  The DOJ charged the two men with helping more than 100 beneficial owners of penny stocks sell billions of shares of those stocks without reporting the transactions. Read More

Second Incarnation of Silk Road Bitcoin Shop Shut Down

Stock Promoters - Investor Relations
On November 6, 2014, U.S. District Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and Homeland Security Investigations (“HSI”) announced the arrest of Blake Benthall in connection with his operation and ownership of a website known as “Silk Road 2.0.”   Read More

What is an Investment Newsletter?

Investment Newsletter Brenda Hamilton
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently issued an Investor Alert warning about the use of investment newsletters and emails as tools for fraud. In this digital age, sensible people know they should be wary of online financial advice, but there are still many who can’t resist the allure of the “guaranteed profits” that will be generated by a “once in a lifetime opportunity” that they learn about via email in their inbox. Read More

How Form S-1 and Form 10 Registration Statements Are Different

Form S-1 - Securities Lawyer 101

Going public often refers to the process of a company filing a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended to register securities for public sale. Unlike a registration statement on Form S-1, a Registration statement on Form 10 registers a class of securities such as common or preferred stock pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12 (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A Form 10 registration statement is automatically effective 60 days after filing, regardless of whether the issuer has responded to all Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) comments.

Registration statements on Form S-1 register specific securities of a company.  Form S-1 can be used to register shares for a company to sell to investors, specific shares for the issuer’s shareholders to resell.  Form S-1 can also be used to register both simultaneously.

The S-1 registers and offers specific shares for the issuer or its stockholders to sell to the public.  Form S-1 can be used for an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) or Direct Public Offering (“DPO”) Read More

SEC Sanctions 10 Issuers for Form 8-K Failures

SEC Enforcement

On November 5, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced enforcement actions against 10 companies for failing to file Current Reports on Form 8-K disclosing financing deals and other unregistered securities sales that diluted their shareholders and investors.

Companies are required to file a Form 8-K to inform investors when shares of common stock are sold in transactions that are not registered with the SEC under the federal securities laws and constitute at least five percent of the total stock held by their shareholders.  Companies also must report when they’ve entered into a financing agreement not made in the ordinary course of business.  Read More

The SEC Investigates Bitcoin Companies

SEC Investigations l Bitcoin l Securities Lawyer 101

Bitcoin blogs have been buzzing recently with news of an SEC investigation into cryptocurrency companies that the agency apparently believes have engaged in potentially illegal securities issuances. Bitcoin has been controversial since it was “invented” several years ago, in large part because ownership, and transactions made using it, are anonymous and, supporters claim, untraceable. Read More

SEC Obtains Judgments Against James Wheeler and MicroHoldings

SEC Enforcement

Securities Lawyer 101 – Securities Law Blog

On October 31, 2014, the Securities & Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) obtained judgments MicroHoldings US, Inc., and its Chief Executive Officer, James Wheeler, in a securities fraud action that was filed in December 2011.  MircroHoldings, a former shell dormant company, traded on the OTC Markets OTC Pink with the symbol (“MCHU”).  MicroHoldings was a “penny stock” as defined by the Exchange Act and  traded at less than $5.00 per share during the relevant periods.

The securities fraud involved a kickback scheme that was exposed by an undercover operation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “FBI”).  MicroHoldings and Wheeler are two of several parties charged on December 1, 2011, by both the SEC and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, alleging that they used kickbacks and other schemes to trigger investments in various thinly-traded stocks.  Read More

OTC Markets Rules for OTCQB Companies

Going Public Lawyer

Posted by Brenda Hamilton Attorney

In May of this year, the OTC Markets’ new rules for OTCQB stocks were implemented, as promised.  The changes took many issuers and investors by surprise adding significant costs to the going public processOTC Markets explained that by instituting this new program, it intended to create a “true venture stage marketplace for early and development stage companies.”  The program’s two most important features are a minimum bid price requirement of $0.01 and an annual fee of $10,000. There was formerly no fee for companies quoted with the OTCQB tier.

 

OTC Markets’ original announcement caused surprise with market participants.  Many issuers wrongly believed that the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) was somehow involved.  It was not.  As far as SEC regulations are concerned, there are only two types of over-the-counter stocks:  SEC registrants, and SEC non-registrants.  OTC Markets is not a regulatory agency or a stock exchange; it is a quotation service.  Nonetheless, it established its own rules and regulations.  In the absence of competition—the old OTCBB, run by FINRA, is now dead, for all practical purposes—companies have no choice but to pay attention.  And money if they want to be quoted above the OTC Pink tier.

Read More

Attorney Kenneth Eade Barred By SEC

SEC Bars Kenneth Eade l Securities Lawyer 101
Securities
Lawyers Gone Wild Series

On October 28, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced the settlement of an administrative proceeding brought by the agency against Kenneth Eade, a securities attorney licensed to practice in California, but living in Paris, France.  By agreeing to the suspension, Eade accepted a suspension from practicing law before the SEC for a period of five years.  “Practicing” comprehends preparing and submitting filings to the SEC, representing clients in SEC enforcement actions, and more.  When the suspension ends, Eade may request permission to resume practicing and appearing before the SEC. Read More

Crowdfunding a Texas Intrastate Offering

Crowdfunding
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Texas is the latest state to embrace equity crowdfunding.  On October 22, 2014, the Texas State Securities Board approved proposed Rule 139.25, which exempts intrastate securities offerings using crowdfunding.  Rule 139.25 will become effective in November of 2014.   The new Texas exemption requires that offers and sales of an issuer’s securities be made exclusively through an Internet website operated by a Texas registered general dealer or Texas registered crowdfunding portal.

Read More

Crowdfunding a Going Public Transaction –

Crowdfund l Securities Lawyer 101
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules for crowdfunding remain in limbo, but 12 states have passed legislation allowing intrastate crowdfunding.  The SEC as well as state securities regulators have provided meaningful guidance addressing intrastate crowdfunding.  One benefit of intrastate crowdfunding is that while it will not give a company public company status, if structured properly, it can serve as a stepping stone in the right direction.

In addition, a crowdfunded offering can serve as a way for the issuer to finance its going public transaction and provide investors with an exit strategy.

To understand how crowdfunding can be used in a going public transaction, you must be familiar with the requirements of going public.  This post addresses only the requirements for companies who go public by filing a registration statement with the SEC.  This is most often accomplished on Form S-1.

A company going public must locate a sponsoring market maker to submit a Form 211 with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) in order to obtain a stock trading or ticker symbol.  FINRA requires that the company be able to establish an active market for its securities.  To do this, the issuer must have a sufficient number of non-affiliate stockholders with unrestricted securities.  FINRA has not established the number of stockholders required to satisfy this requirement. Generally, most sponsoring market makers require at least 20 non-affiliate stockholders who hold at least 250,000 unrestricted shares. Read More

How Do I Spin-Off A Subsidiary? Going Public Lawyers

Spin-offs - Going Public Attorneys
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

A spin-off (“Spin-off”) involves a transaction in which a parent company (“Parent”) distributes securities of its subsidiary (“Subsidiary”) to the Parent’s stockholders so that the Subsidiary becomes a separate, independent company.  Spin-off securities are usually distributed on a pro-rata basis.  State law dictates whether stockholder approval of a spin-off is required.  Securities issued in spin-offs do not require registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) if certain conditions are met.   The SEC has taken the position, that as long as the conditions of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 4, have been satisfied, the spin-off of the Subsidiary’s securities by the Parent will not require a registration statement under the Securities Act.  After the spin-off is complete, the private issuer must locate a sponsoring market maker to submit a Form 211 to FINRA to seek a ticker symbol. Read More

Ebola Stock Scams – FINRA Risk Alert


Securities Law Blog

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) recently issued a Risk Alert about Ebola Stock Scams. The Risk Alert warns investors about potential investment scams involving companies that claim to be involved in the development of products that will prevent the spread of Ebola and other viral diseases like Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).  Read More

SEC Judgment Entered Against James Crane CFO of Subaye

SEC Enforcement -Subaye

On October 20, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced a final judgment, in an enforcement action filed by the SEC in May 2013, against James Crane, the former Chief Financial Officer of Subaye, Inc., a company based in China. Among other things, the judgment orders James Crane to pay $150,000. Crane is also barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company for ten years. According to the SEC Charges, Subaye began promoting itself during 2010 as a provider of cloud computing services to Chinese businesses. According to the SEC complaint, Subaye claimed to have over 1,400 sales and marketing employees in 2010, with reported revenues of $39 million in 2010 and projected revenues of more than $71 million for 2011. Read More

DTCC Removes Global Lock of Veltex Corporation’s Securities

DTC Global Locks & Chills Removed

Effective October 17, 2014, the Depository Trust Company (“DTCC”) has reinstated services for the securities of Veltex Corporation (“Veltex”).

Stephen G. Macklem, CFO of Veltex quantified in a statement, “Veltex, thru the retention of the Law Offices of Hamilton & Associates Law Group, P.A. and its principal Veltex attorney Brenda L. Hamilton, has received communications that the global lock of Veltex’s common shares has been removed.” Read More

Risk Alert – Penny Stock Deposits | Hamilton & Associates

Risk Alert - Penny Stock DepositsOn September 9, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) published a Risk Alert concerning the obligations of broker-dealers who engage in unregistered penny stock transactions on behalf of their customers.  The SEC publication of the staff guidance was accompanied by the announcement of an enforcement action against two E*TRADE Subsidiaries for improperly selling billions of shares of penny stocks through such unregistered securities offerings.

The SEC’s Risk Alert summarizes deficiencies that were discovered by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) during its review of 22 broker-dealers frequently involved in the sale of microcap securities. Read More

Proposals For DTC Chills and Global Locks WITHDRAWN


On December 18, 2013, the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) submitted a proposed rule change to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which regulates its activities.  Its aim was to “specify procedures available to issuers of securities deposited at DTC for book entry services when DTC imposes or intends to impose restrictions on the further deposit and/or book entry transfer of those securities…”

In plain English, the new rule would provide that in most cases, issuers would receive advance notice of planned DTC chills or global locks, and would be able to protest the imposition of the chill or lock proposed.  Emergency actions would still be possible, but issuers could protest them after the fact.  It also set a limit for the duration of DTC chills and locks:  six months in the case of issuers who are SEC registrants, and one year in the case of non-registrants.

Read More