Securities Lawyers Gone Wild l Michael Scaglione Indicted

SEC Trading Suspension l Securities Lawyer 101

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild Series         

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On July 10, 2013, Michael Scaglione, a Coral Gables securities attorney, was arrested by the FBI and charged in the the Eastern District of New York, with laundering more than $750,000 he believed were the proceeds from a penny stock scam. Read More

Going Public Question & Answer l Ask Securities Lawyer 101

Going Public Attorney

Going public is a big step for any company.   The process of “going public” is complex and at times precarious. While going public offers many benefits it also comes with risks and quantities of regulations with which issuers must become familiar.  Despite the risks even in a down economy, the U.S. markets remain an attractive source of capital for both domestic and foreign issuers.

Going public is a complicated and intricate procedure, and it is important to have an experienced securities attorney to help your company navigate through the process in dealing with the Securities & Exchange Commission the (“SEC”), the Financial Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Upon completion of a going public transaction, most companies are subject to the regulations that apply to public companies, including those of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Q. What does it mean for a company to Go Public?

A. Going public often refers to the process of a company filing a registration statement with the SEC to register its securities and become an SEC reporting company.  Other times going public may mean the filing of a Form 211 with FINRA to obtain a ticker symbol for quotation on the OTCMarkets OTC Pink Sheets without filing a registration statement with the SEC.

Q. Why do most companies Go Public?

A. Most companies go public to raise money.  It is much easier for a public company to locate capital than it is for a private company.  Funds raised in going public transactions can be used for working capital, research and development, retiring existing indebtedness, acquiring other companies or businesses or paying suppliers.

Q. What are other advantages of Going Public?

A. Numerous additional benefits come with public company status.  Among them are:

Once a going public transaction is complete, the company will be able to use its common stock as a form of currency and as collateral for loans.

Going public creates value for an issuer’s securities.  Going public also creates liquidity for existing and future investors, and provides an exit strategy for shareholders and/or investors. Additionally, public company stockholders may be able to sell their shares or use them as collateral.

Public companies have greater visibility than private companies. It is easier to build recognition of a public company than a private one. Publicly traded companies are often promoted and gain publicity from their status as a public company.  Further, the media has greater economic incentive to provide coverage of matters concerning public companies than private companies  because of the number of shareholders and investors seeking information about the company.

Going public may allow a private company to attract more qualified employees and key personnel, such as officers and directors because it allows the company’s management and employees to share in its growth and success through stock options and other equity-based compensation.

There is a certain amount of prestige associated with public company status or service to a public company.

Q. What are the disadvantages of Going Public?

A. The disadvantages to going public include:

  Going public requires management to answer to shareholders and give up a certain amount of their control over company matters.

 Going public is expensive and staying public is expensive. Legal, accounting and compliance costs are significant and these costs will have to be paid regardless of whether a company raises capital.

•  After a going public transaction, a newly public company will incur higher costs as a public company, including auditing and legal expenses and costs of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”).

Public companies are subject to more scrutiny than private companies.  Once a company becomes public, certain information must be disclosed to the public, such as executive compensation, financial information, previous violations of the securities and other laws and material agreements must be disclosed. Public companies operate under close scrutiny as well as oversight.

SEC reporting companies must comply with reporting requirements under the Exchange Act as soon as their going public transaction is complete.  Complying with these reporting requirements is costly and time consuming for management.

Going public also exposes the company and its management to liability for false or misleading statements in filings and reports filed with the SEC.

Q. What is the difference between filing a registration statement under the Securities Act and filing a registration statement under the Exchange Act in a Going Public transaction?

A. Filing a registration statement under the Securities Act registers an offering of securities.  Shares registered by the issuer or on behalf of  its selling shareholders who are not affiliates of the issuer generally are unrestricted securities.  Filing a registration statement under the Exchange Act registers a class of securities such as common stock. Registration under the Exchange Act does not register a securities offering and does not create unrestricted securities.

Q. What is a Direct Public Offering?

A. A direct public offering is an offering conducted by a company on its own behalf without an underwriter.  

Q. Can a Direct Public Offering be used in a Going Public transaction?

A. Yes, direct public offerings are often used in conjunction with going public transactions.  

Q. Do I have to file a registration statement with the SEC if I conduct a Direct Public Offering?

A. Not necessarily.  A direct public offering can be structured for a listing on the OTC Markets OTC Pink sheets and it can involve a private offering rather than an offering subject to an SEC registration statement.

Q. What is DTC eligibility and why does my company need to be DTC Eligible? 

A. The DTC serves as the only custodian of  securities for its participants, which include broker-dealers. DTC is also the only securities settlement provider in the U.S. If an issuer’s stock is DTC eligible, DTC will hold an inventory of free-trading street name shares on deposit. These free-trading shares are also  known as the “public float.”  Without DTC eligibility shares can only be publicly traded if there is physical delivery of a stock certificate and payment between a buyer and seller. Without DTC eligibility, it is almost impossible for a public company to establish an active tradign market in its securities.

Q. What is a Reverse Merger ?

A. A reverse merger is a transaction in which a private company merges into or is acquired by an existing public company.

Q. Should I use a Reverse Merger in my Going Public Transaction?

A. Probably not.  Reverse mergers are often vehicles for fraud and new rules impact reverse merger transactions. Most often if done properly, reverse mergers cost more and take longer than filing a registration statement with the SEC in a going public transaction.

Q. Why do some securities attorneys say I should use a Reverse Merger in my Going Public Transaction?

A. Often securities lawyers who suggest reverse merger transactions manufacture shells. They make a substantial amount of money selling their own public shells.

Hamilton & Associates has extensive experience in all aspects of securities law and going public transactions including SEC registration statements on Form S-1, direct public offerings, domestic and international stock exchange listings and quotation on the OTC Markets.

For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton, Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at [email protected] or visit www.securitieslawyer101.com.   This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com

 

 

Form 10 l Form 10 securities lawyer l Form 10 securities attorney l Going Public l Securities Lawyer l Registration Statement l Securities Attorney l Form S-1 l Form S-8 l Form S-3 l Foreign Issuer l SEC attorney l SEC Lawyer l SEC Registration l Reverse Merger l Public Shell l Shell Company l Corporate Hijacking l S-1 l S-1 lawyer l Reverse Merger SEC l Reverse Merger Lawyer l reverse merger attorney l registration statement lawyer l registration statement attorney l Form S-1 lawyer l Form S-1 attorney, Form S-1 SEC, Form S-1 law, Form 144, 144, Rule 144, finder, intermediary, Form 211, market maker

The JOBS Act l Rule 506

Rule 506 - Securities Lawyer 101

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act was signed into law by President Obama on April 5, 2012. The JOBS Act  required the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to issue final regulations regarding the portions of the JOBS Act relating to the elimination of general solicitation in Rule 506 offerings within  90 days of its enactment to allow general advertising and solicitations of Read More

The SEC Blacklists Bad Actors ln Rule 506 Offerings

 SEC Blacklists Bad Actors ln Rule 506 Offerings

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On July 10, 2013, the SEC approved a rule banning the use of the Rule 506 exemption from securities registration if  the issuer and bad actors  had a “disqualifying event.”  The new ban on bad actors becomes effective 60 days after publication in the federal register.

The Rule 506 Bad Actor Blacklist

The SEC’s final disqualification of bad actors in 506 offerings covers the issuer, including its predecessors and affiliated issuers, as well as: Read More

Promissory Notes l Securities Lawyer 101

Crowdfund l Securities Lawyer 101Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Private companies going public seek to raise capital for a variety of reasons.  This capital may be sought from the sale of equity ownership of the corporate entity or debt such as a loan.  Frequently, loans are considered to be securities and as such, are subject to federal and state securities laws. It is important for any company going public to know whether its debt instruments are securities to ensure compliance with relevant securities laws. Read More

Registration Statements l Going Public Lawyer

Registration Statements - Going Public

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

This blog post addresses the most common questions we receive about going public using Form S-1 and the SEC registration statement process.

Q. How do I register a securities offering for my company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)?

A. If you decide that you want to register a public securities offering, the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) requires your company to file a registration statement with the SEC before it can offer or sell its securities.

Q. Will the information contained in my company’s registration statement public?

A. Under most circumstances, any information contained in a registration statement filed with the SEC will immediately become pubic upon filing. Read More

What is the OTC Pink Current Tier? Going Public Lawyers

Pink Sheets

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Q. What is the OTC Markets OTC Pink Current Tier?

A. Companies on the Pink Sheets are assigned to one of three tiers by the OTC Markets based upon the amount of disclosure the Company provides to the public.  The OTC Pink Current Information is the highest of these tiers, created for companies that voluntarily provide specific disclosures to the OTCMarkets. Read More

What Does Rule 506 of Regulation D Require? Going Public Lawyers

Rule 506 - Regulation D

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

To offer and sell securities in the United States, an issuer must comply with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or must offer and sell the securities pursuant to an exemption from the registration statement requirements.  A commonly used private offering exemption is Rule 506 of Regulation D. Rule 506 is a non-exclusive “safe harbor” for the statutory exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The Rule 506 exemption is often used by issuers who engage in go public direct transactions and conduct underwritten and direct public offerings.  With a Regulation D offering only a notice filing on Form D is required to be filed with the SEC.

Read More

SEC Sues Imaging and CEO Dean Janes for Fraud

SEC Enforcement

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On June 26, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed an enforcement action charging Imaging3, Inc. (IMGGQ), and Dean Janes, its CEO, with securities fraud, accusing Janes of misleading shareholders about actions taken by the Food and Drug Read More

Rule 144 C & D l Ask Securities Lawyer 101

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The SEC‘s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations provide  its interpretations of the rules adopted under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  A summary and excerpts of the portions relevant to restricted securities and Rule 144 as interpreted by the SEC are set forth below.

Question: Is Rule 144 available to the issuer of the securities?

Answer: No. Rule 144 is not available to the issuer of the securities.

Question: How long must an underwriter wait before it resells the unsold portion of a “sticky” public offering as if it were compensation? Read More

SEC Suspends Biozoom After Publication of Private Report

Securities Fraud

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On June 25, 2013, the Securities and Exchange (“SEC”) suspended trading in the securities of Biozoom, Inc. (BIZM).  In connection with the SEC action, it stated that certain Biozoom affiliates and shareholders may have unjustifiably Read More

Ask Securities Lawyer 101 l Financial Intermediaries

shutterstock_217613194

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

It is not unusual for a private or public company to be approached by financial intermediary (“Intermediary”) that offers to locate investors in exchange for a fee.  Most Intermediaries are not registered as broker-dealers with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

While many Intermediaries are aware of the factors that will determine whether their services will be deemed unregistered broker dealer activity, few are aware of the Read More

SEC Revokes Five Issuers to Prevent Reverse Merger Scams

Securities Lawyer 101 l Brenda Hamilton Attorney - Reverse Merger Scams

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On May 24, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) revoked the registrations of Enercorp, Inc. (ENCP), FTS Group, Inc. (FLIP), Games, Inc. (n/k/a InQBate Corporation; INQB), Hartmarx Corporation (n/k/a XMH Corp. 1; (HTMXQ), and Penn Treaty American (PTYA) by default in order to avoid reverse merger scams. Read More

FINRA Prohibited Conduct l Broker-Dealer Lawyers

Manipulative Trading - Securities Lawyer 101
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) require that broker-dealers and market makers observe “high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.” FINRA rules also prohibit broker-dealers and market makers from “any manipulative, deceptive, or fraudulent actions.”

Prohibited Conduct l Broker-Dealers l Market Makers

As a warning to the public, FINRA has drawn up a list of specific examples of activities that constitute serious violations of its rules and regulations. These violations harm investors and jeopardize the integrity of the securities markets. Some of the examples used by FINRA are self evident and apply to all market participants, not just those regulated by FINRA. Read More

Penny Stock CEO and Co-Conspirator Convicted of Securities Fraud

Securities Fraud l Securities Lawyer 101 l SEC Defense & Investigations

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On May 3, 2013, in connection with an action that went unnoticed by most penny stock observers, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts announced that John Jordan, of Cameron Park, California, and James Prange, of Greenbush, Wisconsin,had been found guilty of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and of the commission of mail and wire fraud.

Jordan is the CEO of Vida Life International, Ltd. (VILF); Prange is a self-described consultant to microcap companies.  Prange also provided his dubious services to two other companies involved in the prosecution, China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. (CHWM), and the Small Business Company, Inc. (SBCO).  The CEOs of the latter two issuers, along with a China Wi-Max director, pleaded guilty last month to conspiracy to commit securities fraud.

The three companies, all of them fully reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), were far from successful.  Illiquid and low-priced, they had few buyers.  When Prange offered management a way to attract the interest of a supposed penny stock investment fund representative, they couldn’t resist.  Prange explained that management would be expected to pay kickbacks to the representative from any stock purchases made by the fund.  Still, the CEOs didn’t hesitate.  They went ahead with the deal, concealing the kickbacks by using sham consulting agreements and other cooked-up documents. Read More

SEC Charges Ernesto Lujan and Direct Access Partenrs in Venezuelan Fraudulent Bond Kickback Scheme

In its latest SEC action, the SEC charged Ernesto Lujan of Miami, the former head of the Miami office of Direct Access Partners. 

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

In June 12, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought an action against an additional defendant for his role in a frauduent kickback scheme involving the payment of millions of dollars in bribes to a Venezuelan finance official in order to obtain the bond trading business of a state-owned Venezuelan bank, the Banco de Desarrollo Económico y Social de Venezuela (“BANDES”).

In its latest SEC action, the SEC charged Ernesto Lujan of Miami, the former head of the Miami office of Direct Access Partners.  The four original defendants named in Read More

SEC Revokes Registration of Sunrise Solar

SEC Trading Suspension l Securities Lawyer 101

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild Series

Securities Law 101 Blog

Sunrise Solar’s most recent financial report filed was a 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009.

According to the SEC action, Sunrise Solar purported to be in the solar power business, and was located in San Antonio, Texas.  The Read More

SEC Brings Charges in California Alzheimer’s Scam

Alzheimer's ScamCompany President Lies to Investors

Most people think of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as a regulator of publicly traded companies.  But the SEC’s authority extends to any company or individual—public or private—that offers or sells securities.  If the Read More

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild – Michael Stewart

Michael Stewart

Securities Law 101 Blog

On June 21, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), suspended Michael Stewart, a California securities attorney, from practicing before the SEC.  The sanction stemmed from an SEC enforcement action brought by the agency in May 2012; Stewart agreed to settle.

In it, the SEC charged Stewart, John J. Packard, Randall A. Smith, and Apartments Read More

San Diego Penny Stock Promoter Charged with Securities Fraud

In the latest twist to the Bermuda Short Sting of 2003, on June 19, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Division of Enforcement charged David F. Bahr of Rancho Santa Fe, California, with securities fraud for attempting to generate the appearance of market interest in a penny stock in an effort to cause investors to buy the stock. Unfortunately for Bahr, his problems didn't end with the SEC's investigation of  his securities fraud.

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

In the latest twist to the Bermuda Short Sting of 2003, on June 19, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Division of Enforcement charged David F. Bahr of Rancho Santa Fe, California, with securities fraud for attempting to generate the appearance of market interest in a penny stock in an effort to cause investors to buy the stock. Unfortunately for Bahr, his problems didn’t end with the SEC’s investigation of  his securities fraud.

Bahr’s target was iTrackr Systems (IRYS), a Florida company.  According to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, Barr participated in securities fraud by conspiring with a purported businessman who claimed to have access to a network of crooked brokers willing to help out with the fraudulent scheme in return for kickbacks in the amount of 30% of the price of stock they’d purchase through their customers’ accounts. Read More

SEC Revokes Registration of 8 Issuers to Prevent Corporate Hijackings

Reverse Merger

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On June 17, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) revoked the registrations of the securities of Avani International Group, Inc. (AVIT), Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. (BHMNF), Capital Reserve Canada Ltd. (CRSVF), Dynasty Gaming Inc. (n/k/a Blue Zen Memorial Parks, Inc., DNYFF), IXI Mobile Inc. (IXMO), Millennium Energy Corp. (MLME), Shannon International, Inc. (SHIR), and Read More

GenMedx Inc. Changes and Ticker Symbol l Securities Lawyer 101

GenMedx Inc Changes and Ticker Symbol

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Boca Raton, Florida, May 20, 2013, GenMedx, Inc., a Nevada corporation announced its new name and trading symbol. GenMedx, Inc. is now Pyramidion Technology Group, Inc. Effective June 19, 2013, the Company commenced trading on the OTCMarkets under the trading symbol “PYTG”. The previous trading symbol was GMDX. The name change from GenMedx, Inc. to Pyramidion Technology Group, Inc. was effected through a Certificate of Amendment filed with the state of Nevada. The name and symbol change was approved by the Financial Regulatory Authority, effective June 19, 2013. Read More

What Are Short Sale Failures to Deliver?

Short Sale Attorneys

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

In recent weeks, it has been claimed that microcap issuers are the target of rumor mongering by stock bashers working in collusion with market makers and notorious short sellers. It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between legitimate short selling and unlawful manipulative short selling, and to determine whether a stock’s price has declined as the result of dilution or short sales, particularly in the penny markets. Regulation SHO addressed failures-to-deliver in short sales by imposing obligations on broker-dealers and attaching liability for non-compliance.

Rule 10b-21 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) provides liability for the short seller who fails to deliver under certain circumstances. Read More

How Do Reverse Splits Affect My Shares? Going Public

Reverse Stock Split - Going Public Attorneys

Reverse stock splits are often used by public companies to reduce the amount of securities outstanding.  Reverse splits are also used by private companies in corporate restructurings.  Typically in a reverse split, a company reduces the number of its outstanding shares in proportion to the ratio of the reverse stock split so that each stockholder the same percentage of the company’s outstanding shares immediately prior to and after the reverse split.  If approved and effected, the reverse stock split will be realized simultaneously and in the same ratio for all of the company’s common stock. The reverse stock split will affect all holders of the company’s common stock uniformly and will not affect any stockholder’s percentage ownership interest in the company.  Unfortunately, there is typically no set limit on the amount of shares a company may issue after a reverse split which would dilute investors.  The reverse split reduces the shares outstanding thereby facilitating the issuer’s ability to issue more shares. Immediately upon a reverse split becoming effective, issuers often commence issuing new shares and diluting investors.  Shares of issuers enacting reverse splits rarely hold the stock price seen upon effectiveness of the split.
Read More

OTCQX Eliminates Penny Stocks l Securities Lawyer 101

Penny Stock Ban OTCQX

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The OTCMarkets describes its OTCQX marketplace as the premier tier of the U.S. Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets, providing investors with an objective measure to ide3ntify exceptional OTC-traded companies.  The OTCQX U.S. is designated by the OTCMarkets as the market place for young Read More

OTC Pink Sheets l Going Public Attorney

OTC Pink Sheet - Going Public Attorney

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Private companies seeking to go public are opting to list on the OTC Markets OTC Pink Current tier.  Companies seeking to public company status can list on the OTC Pink Current tier without filing a registration statement with the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) if they meet the minimal requirements of the OTC Markets.

The OTC Pink Current tier is available to issuers who do not file reports with the SEC, but voluntarily provide specific disclosures required by OTC Markets through its website located at Read More

FINRA Investor Alert l Alternative Funds Not Typical Mutual Funds

Securities Lawyer 101 l Brenda Hamilton Attorney

Today, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) issued a new Investor Alert concerning investments in alternative hedge funds (“Alternative Funds”).  In the altert, FINRA cautioned investors about the unique characteristics and risks of  Alternative Funds which are not present in traditional investments Read More

SEC Suspends Polar Petroleum Corp. l Securities Lawyer 101

Brenda Hamilton Attorney l Securities Lawyer 101

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On June 10, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) suspended trading in the securities of Polar Petroleum Corp. (“POLR”), a company quoted on the OTC Read More

What is a Regulation S Offering? Going Public Lawyers

Regulation S Exemption

Foreign private issuers may raise capital in the U.S. by registering an offering registered on a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or by selling securities that are exempt from the SEC’s registration requirements.  Many foreign issuers are not familiar with the regulations imposed by U.S. securities laws, and so must take significant precautions when offering and selling securities pursuant to an exemption from registration, to ensure compliance with state and federal securities laws.

Foreign private issuers may make private or limited offerings of securities  by relying on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  Foreign issuers going public can rely upon the exemptions provided by Regulation D of the Securities Act as well as Regulation S to obtain the seed shareholders required by FINRA. Read More

Reverse Mergers l Corporate Hijacking Scams l Securities Lawyer 101

Corporate Hijacking Scams

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Corporate hijackings of public shell companies–also called corporate identity  theft–has been around for more than two  decades.  The public companies taken over in hijackings have become a valuable assets for shell peddlers (frequently securities lawyers & accountants)  seeking reverse merger companies for their clients. They have also become a new target for the SEC. Read More