South Florida Securities Lawyer,Jan Atlas Charged with Fraud
Jan Atlas, a 74-year old attorney based in Ft. Lauderdale was charged on September 17, 2019, with “one count of securities fraud, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 77q(a) and 77x, in Case No. 19CR60258. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Beth F. Bloom in Fort Lauderdale. If convicted, Atlas faces a maximum statutory sentence of up to five years in prison and a fine up to $10,000.”
Investor Relations and Rule 506 (c) Offerings
Rule 506(c) removes the 80-year prohibition against the general solicitation and advertising of private placements. Since the rule change, issuers have been bombarded with investor relations providers offering to assist with may advertise their Rule 506(c) offerings using a variety of venues including the internet, television, seminars, email campaigns and hard mailers. Issuers should conduct thorough due diligence before hiring any third party that purports to provide services in connection with their Rule 506(c) offerings to avoid disqualification of the exemption.
Proper due diligence can also help the issuer avoid other potential securities violations. Read More
Director Bill Hinman Expands on SEC’s Approach to Crypto
According to Forbes, Bill Hinman partook in a fireside chat at Cardozo Law School this week, where he “covered a range of topics related to the regulation of digital securities.” Hinman told Cardozo that the SEC continues to examine their approach to digital securities, and how current securities law should apply to cryptocurrencies and blockchain.
What is an Annual Report on Form 10-K? Securities Lawyer 101
Form 10-K attorneys generally draft the narrative portion of the annual report for publicly traded companies. The Form 10-K report is the most comprehensive of the year. This is because Form 10-K contains the issuer’s audited financial statements. The annual report on Form 10-K details information about the issuer and its operations. The Form 10-K includes most of the information that would also be provided in a Form S-1 registration statement for a securities offering filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Read More
Smaller Reporting Companies (SRCs) – Emerging Growth Companies
Complying with the Smaller Reporting Company Rules
Will Going Public Help Me Raise Capital? Going Public Attorneys
Securities Lawyer 101 – Going Public Blog
Going public is frequently used as a stepping stone by companies seeking to raise capital. A private or public company can raise capital in a variety of ways. Traditional sources of capital for companies include loans from financial institutions such as a bank, or from friends and family as well as receivable financing. Companies raising capital in going public transactions often do so by selling their securities prior to filing an SEC registration statement. Going public is a milestone for any company and there are both advantages and disadvantages that attach to public company status. Many companies going public do so because they believe it will increase their chances of raising capital from investors. Unlike private companies, public companies can offer investors an exit strategy for their investment using their shares. Read More
What Is Required In a Form S-1 Registration Statement?
Form S-1 registration statements are the most commonly used registration statement form. It allows issuers to register various types of offerings and the form can be used by both public and private companies engaged in going public transactions. A Form S-1 registration statement has two principal parts which require expansive SEC disclosures. Part I of the Form S-1 registration statement is the prospectus which requires that the company provide certain disclosures about its business, financial condition, and management.
Part II of Form S-1 contains information that doesn’t have to be delivered to investors. The disclosures required by a Form S-1 registration statement are set forth in Regulation S-K and include the following: Read More
SEC Adopts Rule 163B to Allow All Issuers to “Test-the-Waters”
The SEC has just adopted Securities Act Rule 163B, which will allow all issuers to “gauge market interest in a possible initial public offering or other registered securities offering through discussions with certain institutional investors prior to, or following, the filing of a registration statement.” Previously, only emerging growth companies, or EGCs, were allowed this opportunity.
SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said “Investors and companies alike will benefit from test-the-waters communications, including increasing the likelihood of successful public securities offerings.” Read More
What is a Form 8-A Registration Statement? Securities Lawyer 101
Form 8-A is a shortened type of securities registration statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the “Exchange Act”) that registers a class of an issuer’s securities. A Form 8-A registration statement can be used by Issuers subject to SEC reporting requirements under Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Section 13 of the Exchange Act requires every issuer of a security registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. Additionally, Issuers who have filed a registration statement under the Securities Act may use use Form 8-A instead of Form 10 for Exchange Act registration simultaneously with effectiveness of the Securities Act registration statement. Read More
Ross Mandell Seeks More Info Through FOIA
Ross Mandell was the founder of Sky Capital Holdings, Ltd., a venture capital firm and brokerage. He is currently serving a 12 year sentence for defrauding investors of over $100 million from 2001 to 2006. His case was complicated because the vast majority of his dealings was with U.K. investors, and not U.S. investors, and the applicable law was not entirely clear over whether it was “extraterritorial”. George Conway, who is the husband of the famous Kellyanne, wrote an amicus brief with the Bar of the City of New York on behalf of Mandell’s case, writing that the law did not justify charging Mandell’s U.K. actions. The court disagreed however. You can read more about this here.
Selling Stockholder Disclosures in Form S-1 Registration Statements
Form S-1 requires the registrant to provide specific selling stockholder disclosures. These selling stockholder disclosure requirements in Form S-1 are set forth in Item 507 of Regulation S-K
The First SEC-Qualified Token Offering Raises $23M
Muneeb Ali, the founder of Blockstack PBC, released a blog post this week reporting that his company has raised $23 million in public token offerings. This is significant because Blockstack PBC was the first crypto company to gain SEC approval for a public token offering. They did this through a Regulation A+ offering, which you can read more about in our previous blog posts, which cover the topic extensively.
Shell Shocked – FBI Uses Receivership Shell In Sting
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have announced charges against five individuals, who the authorities allege attempted to manipulate shares of Boston-based Amogear Inc. A review of other recent enforcement cases reflects that hijacked shells have been used repeatedly in manipulative schemes.
Court documents reflect that at least one (unnamed) receivership shell manufacturer has been indicted and provided the FBI with information that led to indictments of the 5 other Amogear defendants. The defendants in the Amogear sting were caught by the undercover FBI operation, with the assistance of the (unnamed) informant and a receivership shell. The Amogear shell corporation was formed in Nevada in 2006 as Kitcher Resources, a mining company. Two years later, Kitcher filed its last financial report with the SEC. Read More
SEC Questions Starbucks’ Accounting Policies
Starbucks’ stock fell today after news broke that the Securities and Exchange Commission sent a letter questioning the way that Starbucks recognizes its revenue. New accounting guidelines were implemented at the end of 2018 that is affecting many public companies. In Starbucks’ case, the SEC wanted clarification as to the reporting of a number of different deals that the company has made. One such deal was a nearly $7 billion agreement with Nestle that would allow them to sell Starbucks products in grocery stores. Another issue was with breakage, which is revenue that comes from unused gift cards or prepaid services.
“When there are issues around revenue recognition, the SEC takes it very seriously because it’s an area that management can manipulate,” said Derryck Coleman, research manager at Audit Analytics. The Wall Street Journal also reported that as of the end of June, 50 other companies have also received letters from the SEC questioning their accounting methods. The SEC explained that companies need to be thorough enough in their reports to ensure that investors are aware of where revenues are coming from, and what the true financial state of the company looks like. Read More
Form 8-A and Form 10 Registration Statements – Securities Lawyer 101
Form 10 and Form 8-A After Securities Act Registration
Once a company completes the filing of its Form S-1 registration statement or Form 1-A offering circular under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) for an initial public offering (IPO) or direct public offering (DPO), it can file a registration statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Long form registration on Form 10 or short form registration on Form 8-A are used to register a class of securities pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.
Form 10 and 8-A can be used to register both debt and equity securities. Upon effectiveness, the issuer becomes subject to SEC reporting requirements. This is different from a Securities Act registration, in which a company registers a certain number of a class of securities (debt or equity) for a particular public distribution. Read More
Leading Vaping Company Juul Warned About its Practices
According to CNBC, the FDA has slammed vaping company Juul for illegal marketing practices and is threatening fines and seizures against the company. Juul has been claiming that its vapes/e-cigarettes are healthy alternatives to cigarettes, but it turns out that might not be the case.
Acting FDA Commissioner Ned Sharpless, M.D. said in a statement posted on the FDA’s website, “Regardless of where products like e-cigarettes fall on the continuum of tobacco product risk, the law is clear that, before marketing tobacco products for reduced risk, companies must demonstrate with scientific evidence that their specific product does in fact pose less risk or is less harmful. JUUL has ignored the law, and very concerningly, has made some of these statements in school to our nation’s youth.” Further, according to CNN, “In November, the FDA revealed that vaping had increased nearly 80% among high schoolers and 50% among middle schoolers since a year earlier. Public health experts have said that Juul has largely propelled the rise, commanding about 75% of the e-cigarette market in the United States.” Read More
Infamous Former Pharma CEO Martin Shkreli Sues Investor from Prison
Martin Shkreli, who gained infamy in 2015 for buying the drug Daraprim, an antiparasite that costs pennies to make, and raising its price to $750 per pill, then later doing all sorts of crazy things, is back at it again, this time from prison.
According to CNBC, Shkreli “filed suit in federal court in Brooklyn against a Florida man, accusing him of fraudulently inducing Shkreli into signing a promissory note that has left him owing $420,000 to the man’s father.” Shkreli claims that the man unfairly pressured him into signing the note, and that the note’s usurious interest makes it invalid under New York law. But as Debra Guzov, the attorney for the defendant George Yaffe points out, Shkreli’s claim is “ironic,” because “the note in question was prepared by Martin Shkreli, so he’s complaining about a document that he actually drafted.” Read More
Public Company SEC Reporting Requirements – Form S-1 Disclosures
Once the SEC staff declares your company’s Securities Act registration statement on Form S-1 effective, the public company becomes subject to the SEC’s reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Public company reporting reporting requirements after a Form S-1 is effective require consideration before going public. Public company reporting requirements include aannual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC on an ongoing basis.
If a public company qualifies as a “smaller reporting company” or an “emerging growth company,” it will be eligible to follow scaled down SEC reporting requirements for its reports.
Once a public company begins compliance with SEC reporting requirements, it will be required to continue reporting unless it satisfies one of the following “thresholds,” in which case its filing obligations are suspended: Read More
When Private Placements Go Public – Rule 506-c Attorneys
Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) provides for a private placement exemption from federal securities registration which is increasingly being used by companies seeking to raise capital prior to going public. While the term “private offering” leaves much to the imagination, the Securities Act provides substantial guidance about the circumstances in which an offering will be deemed a private placement.
Most private placements are made pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act. Rule 506 provides two distinct offering exemptions each with unique requirements. Companies are not required to advertise, and if that is their choice, they may use the prior Rule 506 which is now Rule 506(b), which does not allow solicitation of any kind. If they wish to advertise, they must comply with Rule 506(c) which permits general solicitation advertising, but excludes non-accredited investors from participation in the offering. In addition to Rule 506(c) offerings, issuers must take reasonable steps to verify whether purchasers are accredited investors. As explained below, the SEC has suggested several methods that companies may use to verify accredited investor status.
Accredited Investor Status Under Rule 506(c) l Securities Lawyer 101
Rule 506 is the most commonly used exemption of the Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Issuers conducting Rule 506 Offerings, issuers may use general solicitation and advertising in their securities offerings so long as certain requirements are met including that the issuer take reasonable steps to confirm that each investor is an accredited investor as defined by Rule 506 of Regulation D. Rule 506(c) includes “disqualifying events” for “covered persons” which prevent the issuer from relying on the Rule 506 exemption. This post summarizes how issuers can determine accredited investor status in Rule 506(c) offerings.
Overview of Rule 506(c)
Rule 506(c) allows an issuer to use general solicitation and advertising to sell its securities if the issuer must take reasonable steps to verify that investors are accredited investors.
Under Rule 501 of Regulation D, an accredited investor is any person who comes within any of the following categories, or who the issuer reasonably believes comes within any of the following categories, at the time of the sale of the securities to that person: Read More
Smooth Sailing For General Solicitation Under Rule 506(c) – Going Public Lawyers
Rule 506(c) fundamentally changes how private placements will be conducted, by allowing issuers to engage in general solicitation and advertising if they comply with the Rule’s specific requirements. The advantages offered by Rule 506(c) are significant for issuers who comply with its inflexible but adaptable requirements. In order to ensure smooth sailing and compliance with the new rule, issuers should understand certain basic requirements of the exemption.
The Checklist below sets forth the most significant items the issuer should know about Rule 506(c). Read More
What is an Exempt Direct Public Offering? Rule 506(c) Offering Attorneys
The Direct Public Offering plays an important role in the going public process. Direct Public Offerings provide flexible options for issuers and allow the issuer to structure its going public transactions a variety of ways. Rules adopted pursuant to the JOBS Act, make an exempt Direct Public Offering an appealing and uncomplicated method of raising capital.One of the most important aspects of the going public process involves deciding the terms of the offering that will be presented to investors. The terms of a company’s direct public offering could have future impacts on its business. Investors want to know they will have an exit strategy in the future. This exit strategy can be accomplished a number of ways.
What is a Direct Public Offering?
Direct Public Offerings are not complicated. They are simply securities offerings sold by a company without an underwriter. Direct Public Offerings allow companies to structure their offerings a variety of ways. Direct Public Offerings can include equity, debt, revenue share or royalty payments, memberships, and other securities. Offerings with common shares can pay dividends, offer different classes of shares, limit voting or be structured a number of ways. Debt offerings can be convertible or secured by the company’s assets, revenues or other criteria. Direct Public Offering structures are endless. Read More
Securities Offering Exemptions – SEC Concept Release
SEC Concept Release on Harmonization of Securities Offering Exemptions
In the wake of the stock market crash of 1929, the public had lost confidence in the entirely unregulated U.S. markets. Congress sought to restore it by creating a regulatory structure. The first step taken was passage of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), which required issuers of securities to provide accurate information about their business, the securities they sold, and the risks involved in investing in those securities. The following year, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) was signed into law. The Exchange Act created the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), whose mission was and is to protect investors; maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation.
Since the 1930s, the Securities Act and the Exchange Act have been amended and expanded many times, but they are still the principal laws that govern the activity of the SEC and the regulation of our capital markets. One of the agency’s chief activities is “rulemaking”: from time to time, it proposes new rules whose purpose is to accommodate developments in the marketplace, new laws, new technologies that affect how the markets operate, and more. Proposed rules are preceded by “concept releases,” which explore whether there’s a need for a new rule, and solicit comment from market participants and the general public. Read More
Penny Stock Scalping 101 – Securities Lawyer 101
Stock scalping refers to the illegal and deceptive practice of recommending that others purchase a security while secretly selling the same security. In recent years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and Department of Justice have brought an increasing number of cases alleging securities violations for stock scalping activity. Most often stock scalping occurs in connection with stock promotion or penny stock investor relations activity.
In these schemes, investor relations paid in securities are often engaged in stock scalping activity. Other times, insiders may hire or cause third parties to hire investor relations providers to increase the price and volume of an penny stock issuer’s stock so that they can secretly sell their securities during the investor relations campaigns. Read More
SEC Form D Requirements, Regulation D, Notice of Sales
Whether or not a company is selling shares to accredited or non-accredited investors in its private placement offering under Regulation D, it must file a Form D – Notice of Sales with the Securities & Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Because a Form D must be filed through SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval Filer Management System (“EDGAR”), the issuer must obtain Edgar filer codes.
Edgar filer codes are obtained by filing a Form ID with the SEC. Form ID requires very basic information about the issuer. The SEC requires that the Form ID be manually signed and notarized to ensure that an authorized signatory is submitting the form on the company’s behalf. Permissible Form ID signatories include a company officer or director or an attorney acting pursuant to a power of attorney. Read More
SEC Form 8-K Current Reports, Filing Requirements l Securities Lawyer 101
Private companies going public should be familiar with the requirements of Form 8-K. Once a company completes its going public transaction and its Form S-1 is effective, it is required to comply with the SEC’s periodic reporting requirements.
These requirements include the obligation to report certain material events on Form 8-K within four days of the triggering event. Current Reports on Form 8-K provide investors with current information to enable them to make informed investment decisions.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Reports, Filing Requirements l Going Public Lawyer
Publicly traded companies with a class of securities registered under Section 12 or subject to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), are subject to the SEC’s periodic and current reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Exchange Act contains ongoing disclosure requirements that provide investors with current information on an ongoing basis. These include an obligation to file periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q are required for three of the company’s quarterly periods. Read More
What is an Accredited Investor? Securities Lawyer 101
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) amended the definition of an “accredited” investor to exclude the value of an investor’s primary residence when determining whether the net worth of that person (or joint net worth with his or her spouse) exceeds the $1 million net worth test. For purposes of calculating net worth in determining status of accredited investors, the value of an investor’s primary residence may not be included.
The calculation of an accredited investor’s net worth also excludes the value of any mortgage or other debt secured by an investor’s primary residence from being deducted as a liability for an investor’s net worth provided that the debt does not exceed the fair market value of the primary residence. If the debt exceeds the fair market value of the investor’s primary residence, the excess must be included as a liability in calculating the individual’s net worth. Accredited investor status is determined at the time of the sale of securities to the investor. Read More