Going Public With Regulation A+ – Going Public Attorneys
On March 25, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to Regulation A pursuant to the mandate of Section 401(a) of the JOBS Act. The amended rules known as Amended A+ were adopted to facilitate capital-raising by smaller companies. Regulation A+ expands existing Regulation A. Regulation A+ offerings can be used in combination with direct public offerings and initial public offerings as part of a going public transaction. The exemption simplifies the process of obtaining the seed stockholders required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) while allowing the issuer to raise initial capital.
Both public and private companies can use Regulation A+ but the exemption cannot be used by companies that are subject to the SEC’s reporting requirements. Regulation A+ may prove to be a popular exemption for private companies in going public transactions where the issuer seeks to ease into the public company reporting process. Issuers should also remember that Regulation A+ imposes a ban against certain “bad actors” and expanded Regulation D’s disqualification criteria. Read More
SEC Charges Vadda Energy Corporation With Oil And Gas Fraud
On April 10, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged Mieka Energy Corporation, and its founder and president Daro Ray Blankenship, with fraudulently offering oil and gas investments. Two of Mieka’s salesmen, Robert William Myers, Jr. and Stephen Romo, were charged with acting as unregistered brokers.
The SEC action also charged Mieka’s publicly traded parent company, Vadda Energy Corporation, with fraud and reporting violations for deceptively touting the success of Mieka’s investments. The SEC action alleges that, between September 2010 and October 2011, Blankenship and Mieka raised $4.4 million from approximately 60 investors by selling interests in joint ventures that were to drill and complete two gas wells. Read More
SEC Obtains Officer-Director and Penny Stock Bar Against Michael Cohen
On March 6, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that the United States District Court of New Jersey entered a judgment against Michael M. Cohen. Cohen received a lifetime officer-director bar, lifetime penny stock bar and an injunction prohibiting him from violating certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
The District Court’s judgment, which was entered by consent, permanently enjoined Cohen from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); Rules 10b-5, 13a-14, and 13b2-1 thereunder; and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. Read More
SEC Approves FINRA Rule Allowing Transaction Based Compensation
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently approved Rule 2040 proposed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) which applies to the payment of transaction based compensation to unregistered persons by member firms. Rule 2040 will allow member firms to pay fees, concessions, discounts, commissions or other allowances to unregistered persons if the member firm determines the unregistered person’s activities do not require registration as a broker-dealer.
Support for the determination of whether registration is required can be derived by reasonably relying on previously published releases, no-action letters or SEC staff interpretations, seeking a no-action letter from the SEC, or obtaining a legal opinion from an independent securities attorney. Read More
SEC Charges Brian Polito With Oil and Gas Fraud
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Division of Enforcement filed suit against GC Resources, LLC and Brian J. Polito for oil and gas fraud. According to the allegations, Polito defrauded investors through the sale of interests in oil and gas wells in a company he did not own. Through GC Resources, Polito solicited investors using cold calls and sent potential investors a package that included an accredited investor survey, joint venture agreement, operating agreement, and limited power of attorney. Despite using accredited investor questionnaires borrowed from another entity, GC Resources still sold investments to approximately thirty-five non-accredited investors. According to the allegations, Brian J. Polito had a falling out with his former colleagues, and then bought out their interests in GC Resources. GC Resources continued to conduct legitimate business until December 2011, selling interests in approximately twenty-five wells, some of which are still producing.
Broker Turned Bank Robber Sanctioned by the SEC
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regularly discipline errant brokers and financial advisers, but Leonard Eric Burd’s case is unusual by any standard. On March 31, the SEC announced that it had settled an administrative proceeding it had brought against Burd, a former stockbroker. Burd agreed to accept a permanent penny stock bar; he’d earlier been sanctioned by FINRA.
Read More
SEC Subpoenas 101 – Securities Attorneys
Receiving a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) subpoena is a new and uncomfortable experience for most market participants. A SEC subpoena is an indication that the Division of Enforcement is investigating potential violations of the federal securities laws. SEC subpoenas can be issued to a variety of persons, many of which may not be suspected as securities law violators.
Most market participants understand that the Securities and Exchange Commission ( “SEC”) is a law enforcement agency. SEC Actions can involve a case in federal court or an administrative action. They can be informal or pursuant to an SEC formal order of investigation. SEC actions are common in the penny stock markets and the SEC frequently pursues shell packers, unregistered brokers stock promoters, investor relations firms, attorneys and auditors in connection with penny stock schemes.
FINRA Sanctions Short Seller – Securities & Going Public Attorneys
Short sale conspiracy theorists will be pleased to learn that on March 25, 2015, The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced sanctions of $916,000 against Short Seller, First New York Securities L.L.C. for short selling ahead 14 public offerings of securities, of which it was participating, in violation of Rule 105 of Regulation M. First New York Securities was also sanction for related supervisory violations. FINRA ordered First New York to pay disgorgement of more than $516,000, plus interest, and fined the firm $400,000. Additionally, the firm is prohibited from participating in secondary or follow-on offerings for six months.
Rule 105 of Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 generally prohibits buying securities in secondary offerings when the purchaser sold short the security that is the subject of the offering during a specific restricted period – typically five business days – before the secondary offering is priced. Read More
SEC Issues Trading Suspension of Winsonic Digital Media Group
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the temporary trading suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), of trading in the securities of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. (WDMB), commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 24, 2015 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 7, 2015.
The SEC temporarily suspended trading in WDMG due to a lack of current and accurate information concerning WDMB’s securities because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ending September 30, 2008, or any reports since June 2011.
The SEC cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by the company. Read More
FINRA Reveals Fraud Victims Suffer Stress, Anxiety and Depression
Recently, the FINRA Investor Education Foundation issued a new research report about the impact of financial fraud on its victims. FINRA’s report revealed that nearly two thirds of self-reported financial fraud victims experienced at least one non-financial cost of fraud to a serious degree—including severe stress, anxiety, difficulty sleeping, and depression. FINRA Foundation’s research examines the broader psychological and emotional impact of securities and other forms of financial fraud.
“Financial Fraud’s effects linger and cause distress well after the scam is over. For the first time, we have data on the deep toll that fraud exerts on its victims, and the results are sobering. This new research underscores the importance of the FINRA Foundation’s work with an array of national, state and local partners to help Americans avoid fraud, and assist consumers who have been defrauded,” said FINRA Foundation President Gerri Walsh. Read More
Why Is There A Q On My Ticker Symbol?
When a company is involved in bankruptcy proceedings, the letter “Q” is added to the end of the company’s stock ticker/trading symbol.
More often than not, bankruptcy is the kiss of death for a public company.
In most cases, when a company emerges from bankruptcy, the bankruptcy reorganization plan will involve reverse stock splits or other acts which dilute or cancel the existing common shares and the old shares will be worthless. Given that risk, before investing in the shares of a bankrupt company, investors should read the company’s proposed plan of reorganization. Read More
What Is a Schedule 13D Insider Report? Going Public Attorneys
When a person or group of persons acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a voting class of a company’s equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), they are required to file a Schedule 13D with the SEC.
Once a company completes its going public transaction and the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declares its Form registration statement effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), the company will become subject to the SEC’s periodic reporting requirements. Companies can also become subject to the SEC’s reporting requirements by filing a registration statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended such as a Form 10 for Form 8-A.
These requirements stipulate that the company must file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K on an ongoing basis. Holders of 5% or more of a company that registers a class of securities under the Exchange Act become obligated to file certain beneficial ownership reports including Schedule 13D. Read More
Bad Actor Waivers- Regulation A+ – Rule 506 – Going Public
On March 13, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provided guidance addressing waivers of disqualification for bad actors under Regulation A and Rules 505 and 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. A waiver of disqualification under these provisions may be granted by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance if it determines after a review of all the facts and circumstances that the applicant has met its burden of showing good cause that it is not necessary under the circumstances that the exemptions from the bad actor provisions be denied. Read More
Insiders Charged For Failure to Update Disclosures In Going Private Transactions
On March 13, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged eight officers, directors, or major shareholders of public companies in connection with going private transactions. According to the SEC, the defendants failed to update their stock ownership disclosures to reflect material changes, including steps to take the companies private. Each of the respondents, without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, agreed to settle the proceedings by paying a financial penalty.
The charges involve outdated disclosures in reports filed by “beneficial owners” who hold more than 5 percent of a company’s stock. Federal securities laws require beneficial owners to promptly file an amendment when there is a material change in the facts previously reported by them on Schedule 13D, commonly referred to as a “beneficial ownership report.” The disclosure requirements include plans or proposals that would result in certain transactions, such as a going private transaction. Read More
Form D – Notice of Sales – Going Public Lawyers
Posted By Brenda Hamilton, Securities Lawyer
Companies may use an exemption under Regulation D to offer and sell securities without having to register the offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). When relying on such an exemption, companies must file what’s known as a “Form D” after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes basic information about the company and the offering, such as the names and addresses of the company’s executive officers, the size of the offering and the date of first sale. Read More
SEC Charges HD Vest Investment Securities
On March 4, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it had charged HD Vest Investment Securities with violating key customer protection rules after failing to adequately supervise registered representatives who misappropriated customer funds.
HD Vest Investment Securities agreed to settle the charges by paying a financial penalty and retaining an independent compliance consultant to improve its supervisory controls.
According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, HD Vest has more than 4,500 registered representatives typically working as independent contractors who also operate tax businesses outside of their securities businesses. HD Vest failed to have proper policies and procedures in place to monitor its representatives’ outside business activities, and as a result some representatives used their outside businesses to defraud brokerage customers in such ways as transferring or depositing customer brokerage funds into their outside business accounts. Read More
SEC Adds Additional Defendant In Shaw Insider Trading Case
Posted by Brenda Hamilton Securities Lawyer
On March 6, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it had added Billy Joe Adcox, Jr. of Ruston, Louisiana to a civil injunctive action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, alleging that Adcox, Scott Zeringue and Jesse Roberts, III engaged in insider trading in the securities of The Shaw Group, Inc. (“Shaw”) ahead of a public announcement that Shaw was going to be acquired by Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (“CBI”).
The SEC alleges that Adcox was tipped by his long-time friend, Jesse Roberts, III, also of Ruston, Louisiana. According to the SEC’s insider trading complaint, Adcox knew Roberts got the confidential information about the impending merger from Roberts’ brother-in-law, Zeringue, a Shaw insider. Adcox and his relative allegedly bought Shaw stock based on the tip and, about two weeks later, sold the stock for a profit of over $111,000. Adcox’s relative also tipped a third unnamed individual, who made about $43,000. Read More
FINRA Fines LaSalle Securities For Private Placements
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission require that broker-dealers perform adequate due diligence before letting a registered representative recommend private placements made pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). FINRA listed due diligence of private placements as a concern in its 2015 Regulatory and Examination Priorities). FINRA’s recent case against LaSalle St. Securities LLC (“LaSalle”) demonstrates that this due diligence obligation is mandatory even for private placement offerings made to accredited investors.
FINRA found certain deficiencies that occurred at various times during a four-year period in connection with the offerings of four issuers. The findings stated that with respect to private placement offerings, LaSalle Securities failed to exercise adequate due diligence before allowing a registered representative to recommend the offering to four accredited investors and distributed a private-placement memorandum to potential investors that did not include certain material facts and relied on a flawed methodology for projecting return on investment. Read More
SEC Periodic Reporting – SEC Reporting Requirements – Going Public Lawyers
Companies become subject to the SEC’s periodic reporting requirements a number of ways including by filing a registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC periodic reporting rules require that publicly traded companies disclose a wealth of information to the public. Periodic reporting also requires that these reports be written in plain English. Understanding these reports helps investors make informed decisions regarding whether to buy, sell or hold a company’s securities.
Periodic reports provide issuers with the opportunity to provide shareholders with transparency by telling their story. Companies that provide materially false or misleading statements, or omit material information that is necessary to render a report not misleading in their periodic reports are subject to liabilities arising under federal and state securities laws. Investors can obtain a company’s Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K filings on the SEC’s EDGAR database. Read More
What is Form 13F? Going Public Attorneys
Institutional Investment Managers that exercise investment discretion of $100 million or more in Section 13(f) securities holdings, which include holdings in exchange-traded securities, shares of closed–end investment companies and certain convertible debt securities, must publicly disclose their holdings on Form 13F each quarter.
An “Institutional Investment Manager” is an entity that either invests in, or buys and sells, securities for its own account. As such, banks, insurance companies, and broker/dealers, corporations and pension funds that manage their own investment portfolios are subject to the rule if they invest in, or buy and sell securities for their own account. Read More