Securities Exchange Act Registration Statements

Help I've Filed And I Can't Get UpSecurities Lawyer 101 Blog

All public companies whose securities are registered on a national securities exchange, and generally issuers  whose assets exceed $10,000,000 with a class of equity securities held by 500 or more persons, must register their securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act” or the “1934 Act”). A 1934 Act registration statement requires disclosure of material financial and business information to investors and shareholders. The filing of an Exchange Act registration statement obligates the issuer to provide current public information by filing periodic reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Read More

SEC Tips and the Dodd Frank Act l Ask Securities Lawyer 101

SEC TipsSecurities Lawyer 101 Blog

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) frequently receives tips from whistlblowers. SEC tips from whistleblowers are provided in a variety of ways. The SEC tips are primarily received through the SEC’s online TCR form located at  http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml  or through direct contact with employees and staff at the SEC’s offices.
Upon receipt of what’s called a Form TCR, SEC tips are reviewed by the SEC’s staff for reliability, detail and potential violations of the federal securities laws.
Read More

Filing Requirements for Publicly Traded Companies-Go Public

Periodic Reports Attorney

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

An issuer with a class of securities registered under Section 12 or subject to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  must file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) and Section 15(d).  The SEC requires a review of an issuer’s periodic reports at least once every three years and may review an issuer’s reports more often if it files a registration statement under the Securities Act, as a part of a review of the registration statement. Read More

What Are Form D’s Requirements? Going Public Lawyers

Form D Attorney

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The most common exemptions used by  companies to sell stock prior to going public are those promulgated under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D of the Securities Act. Many issuers who go public do not realize that a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is required. While failure to file a Form D will not necessarily disqualify an issuer from relying upon Regulation D, the failure to file can increase  the probability of comments to the issuer’s S-1 registration statement or Form 211.

A Form D filing is required by most states in order to comply with their own exemptions from registration. As such, any company conducting a Regulation D offering should consult with a securities attorney prior to accepting investor funds.

What Is a Form D?

Form D is a notice of an exempt offering of securities in reliance upon Regulation D (or Section 4(6) of the Securities Act).

What Does a Form D Require?

Form D requires specific information about the issuer and the offering it is conducting. The required information includes (i) the issuer’s identity, (ii) its principal place of business and contact information, (iii) state of domicile (iv) the names and addresses of its executive officers and directors, (v) the specific exemption claimed under the Securities Act, and (v) the identity and contact information of any broker-dealer, finder or other person receiving any commission or other similar compensation relating to the sale of securities in the offering.

Where Do I File the Form D?

The completed Form D must be filed with (i) the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) if the issuer is relying on Rule 506 of Regulation D.  Additionally, state blue sky laws may require the filing of the Form D along with a filing fee.

How Do I File the Form D with the SEC?

The SEC requires the electronic filing of Forms D through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval System (“EDGAR”). To use EDGAR, the issuer must have its own filer identification number (called a “Central Index Key” or “CIK” number) and a set of access codes.

An issuer obtains a CIK number and EDGAR access codes by submitting basic information to the SEC online at its Filer Management page along with a copy of a notarized paper document containing the same information found on the Form D. The paper document is called an “authenticating document,” which can be submitted either (i) by scanning and uploading it to the online submission in PDF format or (ii) by faxing it to the SEC at (202) 504-2474 or (703) 914-4240.

There is currently no electronic filing with the States and where required, the  issuer must file the Form D with an applicable State securities commission in hard copy.

When Must the Form D be Filed?

The Form D must be filed with the SEC no later than 15 calendar days after the “date of first sale” of securities sold based on a claim of exemption under Rule 504, 505 or 506 of Regulation D or Section 4(6) of the Securities Act. For this purpose, the “date of first sale” is the “date on which the first purchaser is irrevocably contractually committed to purchase the securities.” If the date on which the Form D is required to be filed falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, the applicable due date is the first business day following.

Is the Information in a Form D Publicly Available?

Yes, all Forms D filed through EDGAR will be available for public viewing in an interactive and searchable format on the SEC’s website immediately upon filing.

Does the Form D Have To Be Amended?

The Form D must be amended (i) to correct a material mistake of disclosure, as soon as practicable after the discovery of the mistake; (ii) to reflect a change in certain reported information (including any change in the issuer’s directors or officers), as soon as practicable after the change; or (iii) “annually, on or before the first anniversary of the most recent previously filed notice, if the offering is continuing at that time.”

The Form D need not be amended to reflect a change that occurs after the offering terminates. Moreover, certain changes in reported information are deemed not to trigger an amendment, including (i) changes in the issuer’s revenues or aggregate net asset value; (ii) changes in the amount of securities sold in the offering (or the amount remaining to be sold); or (iii) changes in the total number of investors who have participated in the offering.

For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton, Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at [email protected] or visit  www.securitieslawyer101.com.   This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.SecuritiesLawyer101.com

Rule 504 Q & A l Securities Lawyer 101

Rule 504 Offerings

What Is Rule 504?

Rule 504 of Regulation D is an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) for certain companies when they offer and sell securities.

How Much Money Can I Raise From Investors In A 504 Offering?

The aggregate amount raised for an offering of securities under Rule 504 cannot exceed $1,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold within the twelve months before the start of and during the offering of securities under this Rule 504, in reliance on any exemption under section 3(b), or in violation of section 5(a) of the Securities Act. The issuer can, however, issue as much stock as he likes for that $1 million: 10 shares or 10 billion; it makes no difference. Read More

SEC Registration & the Emerging Growth Company

Jobs Act 101 l Securities Lawyer 101
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The JOBS Act makes it easier for issuers who qualify as an emerging growth company to go public direct by exempting them from certain federal securities regulations, by reducing certain SEC reporting requirements. The JOBS Act creates a new category of “emerging growth company” which is defined as a company with annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recently fiscal year.

Read More

The SEC Issues Alert For Reverse Mergers

restrictive legends
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On June 9, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued an Investor Bulletin (the “Bulletin”) cautioning the public about risks associated with issuers that enter U.S. markets through reverse mergers with public shell companies.

In the news release announcing the Bulletin, Lori J. Schock, the Director of the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy was quoted as saying, “Given the potential risks, Read More

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 – Securities Lawyers 101

SEC Rules and Regulations
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) grants broad authority to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to oversee the securities industry. The SEC’s authority includes the power to register, regulate, and overseebrokerage firms, transfer agents, and clearing agencies; as well as securities self regulatory organizations (SROs), including the  Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). Read More

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild l Cameron Linton

Cameron Linton Attorney

On September 14, 2012, the Securities and Exchange (SEC) announced today that the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida entered final judgments against Christel S. Scucci (“Scucci”), her mother Karen S. Beach (“Beach”), their companies Protégé Enterprises, LLC (“Protégé”) and Capital Edge Enterprises, LLC (“Capital Edge”), and their attorney Cameron Linton, Esq. (“Linton”).  According to the SEC Charges, Linton was involved in a scheme to unlawfully acquire and sell shares of penny stock that were never registered for sale to the public, in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”).

Read More

FINRA Rule 6490 – Going Public Attorneys

Rule 6490 Securities & Going Public Attorneys

Significant changes to FINRA Rule 6490 were enacted in September 2010.  Though FINRA’s principal mandate is to regulate broker-dealers, historically it has always exercised some oversight of the over-the-counter markets.  Part of that oversight involves processing corporate action requests from issuers of equity and debt securities not listed on national securities exchanges.  In the past, these requests were always granted, even when inappropriate or submitted late.  These changes to Rule 6490 have put an end to that: a nominal fee is charged for all requests, and issuers who are later to notify will be fined. In certain specific circumstances processing of notices under Rule 6490 may be denied altogether.

The actions of which FINRA must be notified are: name changes, forward stock splits, reverse stock splits, distributions of cash or securities, reinstatement of dormant public shell companies, spin-offs and other actions, and rights and subscription offerings.  In the text of the new rule, FINRA notes that the SEC is concerned that “certain parties” may attempt to use corporate action requests to further fraudulent activities.

Issuers that file timely notice of a corporate action pursuant to Rule 6490 pay a fee of $200.  Filing late can, however, have considerable impact on small issuers, resulting in a fee of up to $5,000 for a notification after an effective date. Read More

Are Rule 504 Shares Free Trading? Securities Lawyer 101

Short Sales l Securities Lawyer 101

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Rule 504 (“Rule 504”) of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) provides an exemption from the registration requirements of the federal securities laws which allows issuers to offer and sell up to $1,000,000 of their securities in any 12-month period.  Rule 504 is frequently misused to create illegal free trading shares.

As discussed below, fraudsters attempt to make an “end run” around Rule 504 requirements by improperly relying upon state statutes in Delaware, Wyoming, New York and Texas which have been the subject of various SEC enforcement actions. The abuses surrounding Rule 504 are so widespread that the SEC has brought numerous enforcement actions against attorneys rendering legal opinions. Read More

SEC Proposes New Rules Regarding General Solicitation and Advertising in Rule 506 Offerings

Manipulative Trading - Securities Lawyer 101
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On August 12, 2012, the SEC proposed amendments to Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Regulation D”) that would allow issuers to use general solicitation and advertising in certain private securities offerings. The proposals were mandated by the JOBS Act, and will allow the use of general solicitation and advertising in offerings made pursuant to Rule 506, as long as all purchasers of securities in the offering are accredited investors as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D of the Securities Act.About Rule 506 Offerings. Read More

Regulation FD and Social Media l Securities Lawyer 101 l Blog

Regulation FD Attorney

On May of 2012, Francesca’s Holdings Corporation announced the termination of its Chief Financial Officer after an internal investigation concluded he had improperly communicated non-public company information over Twitter, which included a tweet that said “Board meeting.  Good numbers = Happy Board” during the quiet period prior to the company’s contemplated earnings release.

Read More

What Causes a DTC Chill? Going Public Lawyers

DTC Chill Attorney

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”), through its subsidiaries, provides clearing, settlement and information services for securities. DTCC’s subsidiary, the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) was created to improve efficiencies and reduce risk in the clearance and settlement of securities transactions. Not all securities are eligible to be settled through DTC and issuers must satisfy the criteria set by DTCC to be settled through DTC. All public companies- SEC reporters and non-reporters alike- are subject to these rules. Once they qualify, they must continue to meet DTC standards in order to maintain eligibility. Read More

Industry Guide 7 l Mining Company Disclosures

Securities Lawyer 101 - Form S-1

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

In their SEC filings, in addition to the disclosures required by Regulation S-K and 20F, mining issuers must include the disclosures required by Industry Guide 7. All U.S mining companies that are SEC filers are required to report under its rules.  Although there is widespread discontent with the guide among mining professionals, so far the SEC has been resistant to calls for change. The guide is divided into three sections. The first contains definitions. These definitions include the terms “reserve,” “proven (measured) reserves,” and “probable (indicated) reserves.”   Generally, the SEC prohibits the disclosure of quantitative estimates for all mineral deposits other than proven and probable reserves unless such information is by foreign or state law. Guide 7 also defines the three stages of mining as “exploration,” “development” and “production” Read More

What Is a Transfer Agent ? Going Public Lawyers

Securities Lawyer 101 - Transfer Agent

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

A shareholder of any company can own securities and transfer the ownership of those securities. Their ownership is reflected on the issuer’s shareholder list. A transfer agent’s role is to issue and cancel certificates to reflect changes in ownership of securities and to act as an intermediary for the company.  A registrar’s job is to maintain the issuer’s register for each issuance, transfer or cancellation. A registrar records  the name, address and tax identification or social security number of each individual and entity holder.  Typically the transfer agent and registrar are the same entity. Read More

Securities Attorney Kelly Rogers Indicted for Role in Oil and Gas Scam

Oil and Gas Fraud

Securities Lawyers Gone Wild Series

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

In May 2012, Kelly Rogers, a Texas attorney specializing in oil and gas, was indicted by the state for stealing $2.8 million from people he persuaded to invest in a company called Falcon Energy.  He was charged with money laundering, theft of property, and securities fraud. This was not Kelly Rogers’ first rodeo.  He was earlier sued for fraud in connection with a Louisiana gas and oil scam; in 2007 he was sanctioned by the SEC for his role in a Ponzi scheme involving high-yield bank debentures that would supposedly yield 25% a month interest.  At that time, Rogers was a managing member of a company called Level Par Investments, which was also a target of the SEC enforcement action.  Ironically, his fellow managers forced him to resign for stealing money from them as well as from investors. Read More

SEC Trading Suspensions 101 l Securities Lawyer 101

SEC Trading Attorney
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Over a year ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in an initiative known as Operation Shell-Expel, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) suspended the trading in 379 shell companies in an effort to prevent the companies from being hijacked by fraudsters and used in reverse mergers scams.  Over the last few weeks, the SEC has suspended an additional 75 issuers. The trading suspensions sent brief shock waves through reverse merger Pennyland. Read More

SEC Issues 379 Trading Suspensions

 Trading Suspensions Attorney

On May 14, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued trading suspensions of 379 dormant companies.  The SEC’s press release explained that the  suspensions were necessary to prevent the dormant companies from being hijacked by fraudsters and used to harm investors through reverse mergers or pump-and-dump schemes.

This move is a highly publicized comprehensive enforcement action ever taken by the agency in a single day.  Observers who check the SEC litigation pages each morning were left open-mouthed at the sight of a very long list of targeted companies.  They ranged from former exchange-listed issues like Cray Computers, Fruehauf Trailer, and Smith Corona-all once household names-to obscure penny stock scams like Firamada Inc., and Stratcomm Media.

Read More

Regulation A & the JOBS Act l Going Public Attorney

Regulation A Attorney

On April 5, 2012, President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), which is intended to help smaller and emerging growth companies access the U.S. capital markets. The JOBS Act amends, and adds new sections to, the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as well as to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Read More

Crowdfunding And the JOBS ACT l Securities Lawyer 101

Jobs Act 101 l Securities Lawyer 101
Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On April 5, 2012, President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), into law. The JOBS Act is comprised of a number of smaller bills that reduce the regulatory burdens confronting emerging companies in private and public financings.  The JOBS Act creates sweeping changes to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and other laws and regulations. Read More

SEC Requires DTC Fairness Procedures

SEC Periodic Reporting

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On September 24, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleging that International Power Group (“IPWG”) had issued shares of common stock in violation of the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.  In the Matter of IPWG,  the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reviewed actions taken by Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), and determined that DTC Fairness Procedures were not provided to IPWG and its actions were subject to SEC review.

The SEC alleged that the recipients of the illegally issued shares sold them publicly when no exemption from registration was available.  On September 30, 2009,  DTC issued a notice to its participants notifying them that DTC suspended IPWG’s common stock as an “Eligible Security” and as such, IPWG’s stock could no longer be traded electronically.  According to the SEC no DTC Fairness Procedures were provided. Read More

Accredited Investor Status in Rule 506 Offerings – Going Public Lawyers

Accredited Investor Status Attorney , Accredited Investor, Accredited Investor Verification, Accredited Investor Verification Provider, Crowdfund, Crowdfunding, Crowdfunding Capital Raise, Crowdfunding Financing, Crowdfunding Lawyer, Direct Listing, Direct Listing Lawyer, DPO, Equity, Equity Offering, Exempt Offering, Form D, Form D Notice, Form D Requirements, Go Public, Going Public, IPO, Notice of Sales, offering circular, PPM, PPM Layer, Private Placement, Private Placement Lawyer, Private Placement Memorandum, Regulation Crowdfunding, Regulation Crowdfunding Securities Offering, Regulation D, Regulation D Offering, Regulation D Requirements, Rule 504, Rule 504 Attorney, Rule 504 lawyer, Rule 506, Rule 506 (b), Rule 506 Q & A, Rule 506-c, Rule 506(b), Rule 506(b) attorney, Rule 506(b) lawyer, Rule 506(c), Rule 506(c) lawyer, SEC Form D, SEC Registration, SEC Reporting, SEC Reporting Requirements, SEC Rule 506(c)

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the “Securities Act”), sets forth a safe harbor from the registration requirements of the Securities Act for certain private placements of securities. In connection with these exemptions, offerings made in reliance upon Regulation D, Rule 504, 505 and 506 can be made to up to 35 non-accredited investors and an unlimited number of “accredited” investors.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) amended the definition of an “accredited” investor to exclude the value of an investor’s primary residence when determining whether the net worth of that person (or joint net worth with his or her spouse) exceeds the $1 million net worth test. The amended rule, established by Dodd Frank became effective on February 27, 2012. Read More

Rule 144 l The Reverse Merger Blacklist

Curt Kramer

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Traditionally, private companies go public by registering an offering under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  Another way for private companies to go public is through a Reverse Merger (“Reverse Merger”) with a publicly traded company.   In a Reverse Merger, a private operating company or its business operations are acquired by, or merge into a publicly traded company, often inactive with negligible operations and assets.   Read More

How to Use a Registration Statement When Going Public

Using a Registration Statement to Go PublicPrivate companies going public with a registration statement (“Registration Statement”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act”). When  a Registration Statement is used, the company files it with the SEC, typically on Form S-1 registering securities it plans to sell or securities held by its shareholders (“Selling Shareholders”). Companies going public should anticipate SEC comments to the registration statement. The SEC reviews and often comments on the disclosures provided in the Registration Statement. Upon confirmation that the SEC is satisfied that the disclosures satisfy the disclosure requirements of the securities laws, it will declare the Registration Statement effective and the securities may be sold.

When a company uses a Registration Statement in its going public or other transaction, the SEC does not comment on, nor does it have the authority to deny effectiveness of a Registration Statement based upon the private company’s business or operations, potential success or its offering.

Going Public and the S-1 Registered Offering

Private companies seeking going public can file a registration statement to register their own securities in a direct public offering or an initial public offering (“IPO”). Securities sold in a direct public offering are sold directly by the private company going public and the securities sold in an IPO are sold by an underwriter who is typically a registered broker dealer. Read More

What Is a Form 144 Notice Of Sales? Rule 144 Requirements

Form 144 Attorney

Rule 144 requires that a “Notice of Sale” on Form 144 be filed by any person for whose account the securities are being sold if the person is an affiliate at the time of sale, or was an affiliate during the 90 days preceding the sale, and is selling more than 5,000 shares or the shares being sold have an aggregate sale price of more than $50,000.

Public Availability of the Form 144 Notice Filing

Form 144 is publicly available upon filing through the SEC’s EDGAR database. Read More

SEC Registration Statements In Going Public Transactions

Going Public Attorneys

Going public is a big step for any company. The process of “going public” is complex and at times precarious. While going public offers many benefits it also comes with risks and quantities of regulations with which issuers must become familiar.  Despite the risks even in a down economy, the U.S. markets remain an attractive source of capital for both domestic and foreign issuers.

Going public is a complicated & intricate procedure, and it is important to have an experienced securities attorney to help your company navigate through the process and deal with the Securities & Exchange Commission the (“SEC”), Financial Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) & Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Read More

SEC’s Mine Safety Disclosure Rules – Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Mine Safety Attorney

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

On December 21, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted final rules to implement the mine safety disclosure requirements of Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform andConsumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). Section 1503’s disclosure requirements are currently in effect and require  SEC reporting issuers that are operators of coal or other mines in the United States to make specific disclosures. Read More

The Regulation D Exemption l Rule 506 l Going Public Lawyers

Rule 506 Attorney- Going Public Lawyer

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

To offer and sell securities in the United States, an issuer must comply with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or must offer and sell the securities pursuant to an exemption from the registration statement requirements. A  commonly used private offering exemption is Rule 506 of Regulation D.   Rule 506 is a non-exclusive “safe harbor” for the statutory exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The Rule 506 exemption is often used by issuers who engage in go public direct transactions and conduct underwritten and direct public offerings. Read More

What Is The Section 4(1) Exemption? Securities Lawyer 101

Section 4(1) Attorney

Securities Lawyer 101 Blog

Rule 144 (“SEC Rule 144”) under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) provides a safe harbor from the registration provisions of the Securities Act for resales of restricted and control securities by persons other than the issuer if all conditions of the rule are complied with.  Section 4(1) of the Securities Act provides an exemption for a transaction “by a person other than an issuer, underwriter, or dealer.”

If the requirements of Rule 144 are met, the seller will not be deemed an underwriter and will be entitled to rely upon the safe harbor of Rule 144 to resell their securities.

Section 4(1) is often referred to as the “ordinary trading” exemption. The main obstacle to the use of Section 4(1) is whether the seller is an underwriter under Section 2(11) of the Securities Act and whether the resale involves a distribution of securities.

Restricted Securities Read More